Cited by 943Usability and User Interface DesignSoftware Engineering Techniques and PracticesInformation Systems Theories and Implementation

User involvement: A review of the benefits and challenges

Kujala, Sari·2003·Behaviour & Information Technology

Abstract

User involvement is a widely accepted principle in development of usable systems. However, it is a vague concept covering many approaches. This study first clarifies the nature of user involvement and its expected benefits, and secondly reviews three streams of research, to evaluate the benefits and problems of varied user involvement approaches in practice. The particular focus of this study is on the early activities in the development process. An analysis of the literature suggests that user involvement has generally positive effects, especially on user satisfaction, and some evidence exists to suggest that taking users as a primary information source is an effective means of requirements capture. However, the role of users must be carefully considered and more cost-efficient practices are needed for gathering users' implicit needs and requirements in real product development contexts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/01449290301782

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kujala, S.
Affiliations
Helsinki University of Technology
Corresponding author
Kujala, Sari
Venue
Behaviour & Information Technology
Published
2003-01
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1-16
ISSN
  • 0144-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1362-3001
OpenAlex
W2087232538
Cited by
943
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 99 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 56 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 57 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 46
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Behaviour and Information Technology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Information Systems Theories and Implementation
Keywords
user participation, usability, requirements capture, user satisfaction, user needs, user-centered design, cost efficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review