The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An Overview of the EPIC Architecture for Cognition and Performance With Application to Human-Computer Interaction
Abstract
EPIC (Executive Process-Interactive Control) is a cognitive architecture especially suited for modeling human multimodal and multiple-task performance. The EPIC architecture includes peripheral sensory-motor processors surrounding a production-rule cognitive processor and is being used to construct precise computational models for a variety of human-computer interaction situations. We briefly describe some of these models to demonstrate how EPIC clarifies basic properties of human performance and provides usefully precise accounts of performance speed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast
John, B. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1996) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/235833.236054 · Cited by 687
Self-citationSplit menus: effectively using selection frequency to organize menus
Sears, A., & Shneiderman, B. (1994) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/174630.174632 · Cited by 293 · cited 2×
“Sears & Shneiderman, 1994 ) have made other proposals for menu search that are rather more elaborate, but without detailed testing against empirical data.”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 22
- Ballas, J. A., Heitmeyer, C. L. & Perez, M. A. (1992b). Evaluating two aspects of direct manipulation in advanced cockpits. Proceedings of the CHZ'92 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 127-134. New York: ACM. · DOI
- Bovair S., 1990, Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 1, 10.1207/s15327051hci0501_1 · DOI
- Card, S. K. (1984). Visual search of computer command menus. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 97-108). London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Elkind, J. I., Card, S. K., Hochberg, J. & Huey, B. M. (Eds.). (1989). Human performance models for computer-aided engineering (National Research Council, Committee on Human Factors). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Gopher, D. (1993). Attentional control: Acquisition and execution of attentional strategies. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention andperformance X I E Synergies in experimental psychology, artijkal intelligence, and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 299-322). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Gopher, D. & Donchin, E. (1986). Workload: An examination of the concept. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufrnan, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook ofperception and human performance, Kd. 11: Cognitivepro~es~es andperformance (pp. 41.1-41.49). New York: Wiley.
- Gray W. D., 1993, Human-Computer Interaction, 8, 237, 10.1207/s15327051hci0803_3 · DOI · Paper page
- Hallett, P. E. (1986). Eye movements. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook ofperception and humanperformance (Vol. 1, pp. 10.1-10.1 12). New York: Wiley.
- Hornof, A. J. & Kieras, D. E. (1997). Cognitive modeling reveals menu search is both random and systematic. Proceedings of the CHZ'97 Conference on Human Factors in Computing System, 107- 114. New York: ACM. · DOI · Paper page
- John B. E., 1996, Human-Computer Interaction, 17, 355
- Kieras, D. E. (1988). Towards a practical GOMS model methodology for user interface design. In M. Helander (Ed.), Handbook of human-conybuter interaction (pp. 135-158). Amsterdam: North-Holland Elsevier. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/264645.264658 · DOI
- Kristofferson, A. B. (1967). Attention and psychophysical time. In A. F. Sanders (Ed.), Attention andpa$ormance (pp. 93-100). Amsterdam: North-Holland. · DOI
- Laird, J., Rosenbloom, P. & Newell, A. (1986). Universal subgoaling and chnking. Boston: Kluwer. · DOI
- Lee E., 1985, Human Factors, 27, 157, 10.1177/001872088502700203 · DOI
- Martin-Emerson, R. & Wickens, C. D. (1992). The vertical visual field and implications for the head-up display. Aocecdings of t h 36th Annual Symposium of the Human Factors Society, 1408- 1412. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society. · DOI
- McMillan, G. R., Beevis, D., SaIas, E., Strub, M. H., Sutton, R. &Van Breda, L. (1989). Applications of human pejormance models to system design. New York: Plenum. · DOI
- Meyer D. E., 1997, Psychological Review, 704, 3, 10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.3 · DOI · Paper page
- Meyer D. E., 1997, Psychological Review, 704, 749, 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.749 · DOI · Paper page
- Newell, A. (1990). Unifid theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Norman, D. A. & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz, & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Comciousness and self-regulation (Vol. 4, pp. 1-18). New York: Plenum.
- Rosenbaum, D. A. (1980). Human movement initiation: Specification of arm, direction, and extent. journal ofExperimenta1 Psychology: General, 709,475-495. · DOI
Cited by
The GOMS family of user interface analysis techniques: comparison and contrast
John, B. E., & Kieras, D. E. (1996) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/235833.236054 · Cited by 687
Self-citationLaird, J. E., Lebiere, C., & Rosenbloom, P. S. (2017) · AI Magazine · doi:10.1609/aimag.v38i4.2744 · Cited by 392
“…considering for this include, but are not limited to, CHREST (Gobet and Lane 2010), Clarion (Sun 2016), Companions (Forbus and Hinrichs 2006), EPIC (Kieras and Meyer 1997), ICARUS (Langley and Choi 2006), Leabra (O’Reilly, Hazy, and Herd 2016), LIDA (Franklin and Patterson 2006), MicroPsi (Bach…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNew theoretical approaches for human‐computer interaction
Rogers, Y. (2004) · Annual Review of Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/aris.1440380103 · Cited by 386
Gray, W. D., Sims, C. R., Fu, W.-T., & Schoelles, M. J. (2006) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.113.3.461 · Cited by 360
Honig, S., & Oron-Gilad, T. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00861 · Cited by 338
“There are many theories regarding how people process information (e.g., McClelland, 1979; Card et al., 1983, 1986; Miller, 1988; Kieras and Meyer, 1997).”
BackgroundGRAY, W. (2004) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/s0364-0213(04)00005-9 · Cited by 321
(2007) · Cited by 192
Duric, Z., Gray, W. D., Heishman, R., Li, F., Rosenfeld, A., Schoelles, M. J., Schunn, C., & Wechsler, H. (2002) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2002.801449 · Cited by 185
Model-based evaluation of expert cell phone menu interaction
Amant, R. S., Horton, T. E., & Ritter, F. E. (2007) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/1229855.1229856 · Cited by 180
(2004) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 160
Bailly, G., Lecolinet, E., & Nigay, L. (2017) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3002171 · Cited by 139
Enhancing intelligent agents with episodic memory
Nuxoll, A. M., & Laird, J. E. (2012) · Cognitive Systems Research · doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2011.10.002 · Cited by 99
Cognitive modeling reveals menu search in both random and systematic
Hornof, A. J., & Kieras, D. E. (1997) · Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human factors in computing systems · doi:10.1145/258549.258621 · Cited by 98
Self-citationHuman Information Processing: An Overview for Human–Computer Interaction
Proctor, R., & Vu, K.-P. (2009) · Human Factors and Ergonomics · doi:10.1201/b10368-4 · Cited by 52
Learning, Forgetting, and Relearning for Keystroke- and Mouse-Driven Tasks: Relearning Is Important
Kim, J. W., & Ritter, F. E. (2015) · Human–Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/07370024.2013.828564 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Kieras, D. E., & Meyer, D. E.
- Venue
- Human–Computer Interaction
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 391-438
- ISSN
- 0737-0024 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7051
- OpenAlex
- W2021898394
- Cited by
- 689
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
