Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 547

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychometric qualities of the rand 36-item health survey 1.0: A multidimensional measure of general health status

Zee, Karen I., Sanderman, Robbert, Heyink, Joost W., Haes, Hanneke·1996·International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
DOI 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0302_2
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327558ijbm0302_2

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Aaronson, N. K., Acquadro, C., Alonso, J., Apolone, G., Buequet, D., Builinger, M., Bungay, K., Fukuhara, B., Gandek, B., Keller, S., Razavi, D., Sanson-Fisher, R., Sullivan, M., Wood-Dauphinec, S., Wagner, A., & Ware, J. E. (1992). International Quality of Life Assessment (lQOLA) project: Special communication. Quality of Life Research, 1, 349–351. · DOI · Paper page
  2. Anderson, J. S. C. Sullivan, F., & Usherwood, T. P. (1990). The Medical Outcome Study Instrument (MOSI)—Use of a new health status measure in Britain. Family practice, 7, 205–218. · DOI
  3. Bouma, J., Ranchor, A. V., & Sanderman, R. (1993). Social class and health differences. An empirical study into the relationship between well-being, depression, perceived health, chronic diseases and social class. In A. V. Ranchor, J. Bouma, & R. Sandernan (Eds.), Socical Economische Status en her myorardinfarct: Verslag ten behoeve van de Programmacommissie Sociecl Economische Gezondheidsverschillen (SEGV) [Socioeconomic status and myocardial infarction]. Groningen, The Netherlands: Noordelijk Centrum voor Gezondhcidsvraagstukken.
  4. Brazier, J. E., Harper, R., Jones, N. M. B., Cathain, A., Thomas, K. J., Usherwood, T., & Westlaks, L. (1992). Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: New outcomes measure for primary care. British Medical Journal, 305, 160–164. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Brook, R. J., Ware, J. E., Davies-Avery, A., Stewart, A. L., Donald, C. A., Rogers, W. H., Williams, K. N., & Johnston, S. A. (1979). Overview of adult heallh status measures fielded in RAND’s Health Insurance Study. Medical Cure, 15, 724–735.
  6. Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). Hypochondriasis, neuroticism. and aging: When.are somatic complaints unfounded? American Psychologist, 40, 19–28. · DOI
  7. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1987) Personality assessment in psychosomatic medicine. Value of a trait taxonomy. Advances in Psychosomatic Medicine, 17, 71–82. · DOI
  8. DeBakker, D. H., Claesens, A. A. M. C. & Van der Velden, J. (1992). Man-vrouw verschillen in gezondheid en medische consumptie. Nutionale studie van ziekten en verrichtingen in de hwsartsenpraktijk [Sex-differences in health and in the use of Heallh Services. A national study of diseases and operations in general practice]. Utrecht. The Netherlands: NIVEL.
  9. Essink-Bot, M. L.,& Ruttcn-VanMölken, M. P. M. H. (1991). Het meten van de gezondheidsistoestand: invenrarisatie van meetinstrumemen voor medical technology assessment [The measurement of health status: An overview of measures for medical technology assessment]. Rotterdam/Maastricht: Institute of Community Health Care/Institute of Medical Technology Assessment. Erasmus University Rotterdam/University of Limhurg.
  10. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual for the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire. San Diego, CA: Education and Industrial Testing Services.
  11. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1991). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Scales (EPS Adult). London: Hodder & Stoughton.
  12. Garait, A. M., Ruta, D. A.,Abdalla, M. I., Buckingham, J. K.,& Russell, L. T. (1993). The SF-36 health survey questionnaire. An outcome measure suitable for routline use within the NHS? British Medical Journal, 306, 1440–1443. · DOI · Paper page
  13. Hays, R. D., & Hayaski, T. (1990). Beyond internal consistency reliability: Rationale and user’s guide for Munnrail Scaling Analysis Program on the microcomputer. Behavior Research Methods. Instruments and Computers, 22, 167–175. · DOI · Paper page
  14. Hunt, S., McKenna, S. P., & McEwen, J. (1989). The Nottingham Health Profile user’s manual, Manchester, England: Galen Research & Consultancy.
  15. Jenkinson, C., Coulter, A., & Wright, L. (1993). Short form (SF-36) health survey questionnaire. Normative data for adults in working age. British Medical Journal, 306, 1437–1440. · DOI · Paper page
  16. Kiers, H. A. L. (1990). SCA: A program for simultaneous components analysis of variables measured in two or more populations. Groningen, The Netherlands: Progamma.
  17. König-Zahn, C., Furer, J., & Tax, B. (1991) Interimrapport project gezondtieidsmeting [Interim report of a health assessment project]. Nijmegen, The Netherlands: Institute of Social Medicine, University of Nijmegen.
  18. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1986). Personality, coping, and coping effectiveness in an adult sample. Journal of Personality, 54, 385–405. · DOI · Paper page
  19. McDermott, W. (1981). Absence of indicators of the influence of physicians on a society’s health. American Journal of Medicine, 7, 833–843. · DOI
  20. McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., & Raczek, A. E. (1993). The MOS 36-Item Short Form Heallh Status Survey (SF-36). II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Medical Care, 31, 247–263. · DOI · Paper page
  21. McHorney, C. A., Ware, J. E., Rogers, W., Raczek, A. E., & Lu, J. F.(1992). The validity and relative precision of MOS short- and long-form health status scales and Dartmouth COOP charts: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Medical Care, 30, MS2S3-MS265. · DOI · Paper page
  22. Nelson, E. C., Landgraf, J. M., Hays, R. D., Wasson, J. H., & Kirk, J. W. (1990). The functional status of patients: How can it be measured in physicians offices? Medical Care, 28, 1111–1126. · DOI · Paper page
  23. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill
  24. RAND Health Sciences Program. (1992). RAND 36-item health survey 1.0. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
  25. Sanderman, R., Eysenck, S. B. G., & Arrindell, W. A. (1991). Cross-cultural comparisons of personality: The Netherlands and England. Psychoiogical Reports, 69, 1091–1096. · DOI
  26. Scholten, J. H. C., & VanWeel, C. (1992). Functional status assessment in family practice: The Dartmouth COOP Functional Health Assessment Charts/WONCA. Lelystad. The Netherlands: Meditekst.
  27. Sherbourne, C. D., & Meredith, L. S. (1992). Quality of self-report data: A comparison of older and younger chronically ill patients. Journal of Gerontology, 47, S204-S211. · DOI
  28. Ten Berge, J. M. F., & Sicro, F. W. (1994). Factornnalyse [Factor analysis]. In A. Knippenberg & F. W. Siero (Eds.). Multivariate Analyse. Beknopte inleiding en toepassingen [Multivariate analysis Introduction and Applications], (pp. 53–82) Houten, The Netherlands: Bohn Staflen & van Loghum.
  29. VanderZee, K. L., & Sanderman, R. (1994). Het meten van de algemeng gezondheidsutestand met de RAND-36. Een handleiding [Measuring general health Status with the RAND-36. Users Manual] Groningen, The Netherlands: Northern Center of Health Care Research.
  30. VanderZee, K. L. Sanderman, R.,& Heyink, J. (1996). A comparison of two multidimensional measures of health status: The Nottingham Health Profile and the RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Quality of Life Research, 5, 165–174. · DOI
  31. VanWeel, C., König-Zahn, C., Touw-Otten, F. W. M. M., VanDuijn, N. P., & Meyboom-DeJong, B. (1995). Measuring junctional health status with the COOP/WONCA Charts, Groningen, The Netherlands: Northern Center of Health Care Research.

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Zee, K. I., Sanderman, R., Heyink, J. W., & Haes, H.
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
1996-06
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
104-122
ISSN
  • 1070-5503 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7558
DOI
10.1207/s15327558ijbm0302_2
OpenAlex
W2111859264
Cited by
547
References
5
FWCI
10.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.