The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Executive Function and False-Belief Understanding in Preschool Children: Two Tasks Are Harder Than One
Abstract
In this research we examine the relation between executive function (EF) and false-belief (FB) understanding in young children. Specifically, we proposed that performance on tasks combining 2 executive demands: (a) working memory and (b) inhibitory control would be most predictive of performance on FB tasks. Forty-eight children between the ages of 3 and 5 years were given a battery of EF and FB measures. As predicted we found that performance on executive tasks that combined demands for memory and inhibitory control were highly predictive of performance on FB tasks. To further test the relation of EF and FB understanding we also introduced an experimental manipulation designed to reduce the working memory demands of FB tasks. This manipulation did not significantly improve performance. The results from this study provide support for the relation between EF and FB understanding, although the exact nature of the relation requires further clarification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974) · Psychology of Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60452-1 · Cited by 9,860
Wimmer, H. (1983) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/0010-0277(83)90004-5 · Cited by 6,305
Executive functions and developmental psychopathology.
Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1996.tb01380.x · Cited by 3,150 · cited 1×
“Pennington and his colleagues (e.g., Pennington, 1997; Pennington et al., 1997; Pennington & Ozonoff, 1996; Welsh et al., 1991) identify three dimensions of EF: working memory (WM), inhibitory control (IC), and attentional flexibility.”
BackgroundIndividual Differences in Inhibitory Control and Children's Theory of Mind
Carlson, S. M., & Moses, L. J. (2001) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/1467-8624.00333 · Cited by 2,072
Three-year-olds’ difficulty with false belief: The case for a conceptual deficit
Perner, J., Leekam, S. R., & Wimmer, H. (1987) · British Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-835x.1987.tb01048.x · Cited by 1,550
A normative‐developmental study of executive function: A window on prefrontal function in children
Welsh, M. C., Pennington, B. F., & Groisser, D. B. (1991) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649109540483 · Cited by 1,313
Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning
Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995) · Cognitive Development · doi:10.1016/0885-2014(95)90024-1 · Cited by 923
An interactive framework for examining prefrontal cognitive processes
Roberts, R. J., & Pennington, B. F. (1996) · Developmental Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/87565649609540642 · Cited by 392
Cited by
Milligan, K., Astington, J. W., & Dack, L. A. (2007) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01018.x · Cited by 1,248
False-belief understanding in infants
Baillargeon, R., Scott, R. M., & He, Z. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.12.006 · Cited by 1,030
Executive function and theory of mind: Stability and prediction from ages 2 to 3.
Carlson, S. M., Mandell, D. J., & Williams, L. (2004) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.40.6.1105 · Cited by 684
Carlson, S. M., Moses, L. J., & Claxton, L. J. (2004) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2004.01.002 · Cited by 614
Executive function and theory of mind. Predictive relations from ages 2 to 4
Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2007) · Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1447 · Cited by 453
Song, H.-J., Onishi, K. H., Baillargeon, R., & Fisher, C. (2008) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.08.008 · Cited by 257
A review of the day–night task: The Stroop paradigm and interference control in young children
Montgomery, D. E., & Koeltzow, T. E. (2010) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2010.07.001 · Cited by 131
The Executive Functions of Language in Preschool Children
Müller, U., Jacques, S., Brocki, K., & Zelazo, P. D. (2009) · Private Speech, Executive Functioning, and the Development of Verbal Self-Regulation · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511581533.005 · Cited by 94
What is theory of mind? A psychometric study of theory of mind and intelligence
Navarro, E. (2022) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2022.101495 · Cited by 36
Metadata
- Authors
- Hala, S., Hug, S., & Henderson, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Cognition and Development
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-08
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 275-298
- ISSN
- 1524-8372 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7647
- OpenAlex
- W2091459067
- Cited by
- 171
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 11.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
