Cited by 58Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentDevelopmental and Educational NeuropsychologyCognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

The Development of Symbolic Coordination: Representation of Imagined Objects, Executive Function, and Theory of Mind

Dick, Anthony Steven, Overton, Willis F., Kovacs, Stacie L.·2005·Journal of Cognition and Development

Abstract

Children's developing competence with symbolic representations was assessed in 3 studies. Study 1 examined the hypothesis that the production of imaginary symbolic objects in pantomime requires the simultaneous coordination of the dual representations of a dynamic action and a symbolic object. We explored this coordination of symbolic representations in 3- to 5-year-olds with a modified action pantomime task that employed both a "dynamic action + object" condition and a "hold + object" condition. Consistent with earlier research, production of imaginary symbolic objects rather than body-part-as-objects increased with age, although, even at age 5, children did not perform at adult levels. As hypothesized, children produced fewer body-part-as-object anchors when they were simply asked to hold an object, rather than perform a dynamic action with the object. Study 2 repeated the conditions of Study 1 and examined these conditions in relation to performance on the Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) task. This study replicated the developmental findings of the earlier study and indicated a modest relation between pantomime and the DCCS, which disappeared with age partialled out. Study 3 examined the action pantomime task in relation to the DCCS, false belief, and appearance-reality with 3- to 5-year-olds. Though performance on the DCCS was related to theory of mind, production of imaginary symbolic objects in pantomime was not strongly related to theory of mind or the DCCS. Result…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327647jcd0601_8

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the standard Dimensional Change Card Sort for children, most 3-year-olds perseverate during the post-switch phase, whereas most 5-year-olds switch flexibly.

    “Most 3-year-olds perseverate during the post-switch phase, continuing to sort test cards by the first dimension, whereas most 5-year-olds switch flexibly (e.g., Dick, Overton, & Kovacs, 2005; Kirkham, Cruess, & Diamond, 2003; Zelazo, Müller, Frye, & Marcovitch, 2003).”

    From NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery (CB): Validation of Executive Function Measures in Adults (2014) · cites this paper as Dick, Overton, & Kovacs, 2005

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dick, A. S., Overton, W. F., & Kovacs, S. L.
Venue
Journal of Cognition and Development
Published
2005-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
133-161
ISSN
  • 1524-8372 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7647
OpenAlex
W2029845782
Cited by
58
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Cognition and Development (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Developmental and Educational Neuropsychology
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
Keywords
symbolic representation, imaginary objects, pantomime, executive function, theory of mind, false belief, Dimensional Change Card Sort, reflective competence, preschool children, cognitive development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review