The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Technology to Assist in Realizing Effective Learning and Instruction: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning
Abstract
This article describes a principled approach to the design of computer-based tools for use in collaborative instruction. We argue that a project should progress through four steps: (a) making explicit the instructional requirements that serve as design goals for the project; (b) performing a detailed study of current educational practice with regard to these goals; (c) developing a specification based on the identified requirements/limitations of the instructional setting and the known capabilities of the technology; and (d) producing an implementation that allows for local adaptation to instructional practice. We propose six principles of effective learning and instruction, which we view to be the critical features of learning in complex and ill-structured fields. Next, a detailed case study is presented based on the preclinical training given to medical students in the first 2 years of medical school. The problems of providing adequate instruction in the preclinical years are described, as is an instructional method known as problem-based learning (PBL) that has been introduced to redress some of these problems. The product of this design process is a set of specifications for technical augmentations that we believe will serve not only the needs of PBL but also those of other methods of instruction that depend on collaborative, case-based, or student-centered learning.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0020071 · Cited by 4,540
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Blumenfeld, P. C., Soloway, E., Marx, R. W., Krajcik, J. S., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.1991.9653139 · Cited by 3,594
Self‐Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems
Chi, M. T. H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M. W., Reimann, P., & Glaser, R. (1989) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1302_1 · Cited by 1,714
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., Newman, S. E., & Montclair State University (1988) · Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children · doi:10.5840/thinking19888129 · Cited by 1,299
Education and thinking: The role of knowledge.
Glaser, R. (1984) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.39.2.93 · Cited by 1,272 · cited 1×
“Among other things, this suggests that the learning of basic conceptual knowledge should not be separated from applications of this knowledge as it often is, but rather, to be useful, knowledge acquisition and application should be highly intertwined (Bransford, Vye, Kintzer, & Risko, 1990; Glaser, 1984).”
BackgroundSubjective organization in free recall of "unrelated" words.
Tulving, E. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043150 · Cited by 867
Cited by
Kolodner, J. L., Camp, P. J., Crismond, D., Fasse, B., Gray, J., Holbrook, J., Puntambekar, S., & Ryan, M. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1204_2 · Cited by 1,061
The Emergence of Abstract Representations in Dyad Problem Solving
Schwartz, D. L. (1995) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0403_3 · Cited by 410
Designing technology to support reflection
Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02299633 · Cited by 342
Just-in-time information presentation and the acquisition of complex cognitive skills
Kester, L., Kirschner, P. A., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Baumer, A. (2001) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0747-5632(01)00011-5 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Authors
- Koschmann, T. D., Myers, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 227-264
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W1991851461
- Cited by
- 229
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 30.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using Technology to Assist in Realizing Effective Learning and Instruction: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_2
- The paper
- Koschmann, T. D., Myers, A. C., Feltovich, P. J., & Barrows, H. S. (1994). Using Technology to Assist in Realizing Effective Learning and Instruction: A Principled Approach to the Use of Computers in Collaborative Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls0303_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
