CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 131Innovative Education and Learning PracticesInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsScience Education and Pedagogy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Constructivism in Practice: A Comparison and Contrast of Apprenticeship and Constructionist Learning Environments

Hay, Kenneth E., Barab, Sasha A.·2001·Journal of the Learning Sciences
DOI 10.1207/s15327809jls1003_3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This article compares and contrasts 2 summer camps. Future Camp 97 is based on assumptions consistent with constructionism and Scientists Apprentice Camp 97 consistent with legitimate peripheral participation. These 2 learning environments create an opportunity to do an empirical, as opposed to a strictly theoretical, comparison of what has been frequently lumped under the term constructivism. The goal of this article is twofold: First, to move the discourse away from comparing constructivist learning environments solely to traditional learning environments. The 2nd goal is to move away from talking of a single constructivist learning environment, and instead to explore the nuances of learning environments based on different theoretical assumptions. Toward these ends, we analyze 2 summer camps in terms of theoretical assumptions, community and groups, participant roles, practices, and other evidence of learning. We conclude with a discussion of similarities and distinctions between these 2 learning environments, highlighting issues of ownership, authenticity, power, and task structure.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327809jls1003_3

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Hay, K. E. (1999). Computational Science Inquiry Cycle (CSIC): Students "Doing"New Science Enabled by Virtual Reality. Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
  2. Osberg, K. M., Winn, W., Rose, H., Hollander, A. & Hoffman, H. (1997, May). The effect of having Grade Seven students construct virtual environments on their comprehension of science. In Proceedings of the Annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
  3. Papert, S. (1991). Situtating constructionism. In I. Harel & S. Papert (Eds.), Constructionism (pp. 5-23). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
  4. Perkins D., 1991, Educational Technology, 31, 18
  5. Resnick, M. (1996). New paradigms for computer, new paradigms for thinking. In Y. B. Kafai & M. Resnick (Eds.), Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digital world (pp. 255-268). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  6. Scriven, M. S. (1983). Evaluation methodologies. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 229-260). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
  7. Shaffer D. W., 1999, Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 10, 195
  8. Spiro R, J., 1991, Educational Technology, 5, 24
  9. Young, M. & McNeese, M. (1995). A situated cognition approach to problem solving. In J. Flach, P. Hancock, & K. Vicente (Eds.), The ecology of human-machine systems (pp. 359-391). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 131

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Hay, K. E., & Barab, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Georgia (US)
Venue
Journal of the Learning Sciences
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2001-07
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
281-322
ISSN
  • 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7809
DOI
10.1207/s15327809jls1003_3
OpenAlex
W2090300396
Cited by
131
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 8
FWCI
6.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of the Learning Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
constructivism, apprenticeship, legitimate peripheral participation, summer camps, learning communities, participant roles, task structure, authenticity, ownership of learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review