The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 70 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations
Abstract
This article explores how students' epistemological ideas about the nature of science interact with their conceptual understanding of a particular domain, as reflected in written explanations for an event of natural selection constructed by groups of high school students through a technology-supported curriculum about evolution. Analyses intended to disentangle conceptual and epistemic aspects of explanation reveal that groups sought plausible causal accounts of observed data, and were sensitive to the need for causal coherence, while articulating explanations consistent with the theory of natural selection. Groups often failed to explicitly cite data to support key claims, however, both because of difficulty in interpreting data and because they did not seem to see explicit evidence as crucial to an explanation. These findings reveal that students have productive epistemic resources to bring to bear during inquiry, but highlight the need for an epistemic discourse around student-generated artifacts to deepen both the conceptual and epistemological understanding students may develop through inquiry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation.
Bloch, M., Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1994) · Man · doi:10.2307/2804509 · Cited by 39,454
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
Kuhn, T. S., & Schlegel, R. (1963) · Physics Today · doi:10.1063/1.3050879 · Cited by 35,538
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
National Science Education Standards
Shea, J. H. (1995) · Journal of Geological Education · doi:10.5408/0022-1368-43.2.102 · Cited by 7,888
Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts
Latour, B. (1986) · DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) · Cited by 7,491
Toulmin, S. E. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511840005 · Cited by 7,101
Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0612 · Cited by 5,464
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
Talking science: language, learning, and values
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5211 · Cited by 3,996
Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Crafts of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics
Collins, A., Brown, J. S., & Newman, S. E. (2018) · Knowing, Learning, and Instruction · doi:10.4324/9781315044408-14 · Cited by 3,674
Cited by
Self-regulation in the classroom: a perspective on assessment and intervention.
Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x · Cited by 1,479
Scaffolding Complex Learning: The Mechanisms of Structuring and Problematizing Student Work
Reiser, B. J. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_2 · Cited by 1,054
A Scaffolding Design Framework for Software to Support Science Inquiry
Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., Kyza, E., Edelson, D., & Soloway, E. (2004) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1303_4 · Cited by 1,015
Handbook of Research on Learning and Instruction
(2011) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203839089 · Cited by 916
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., & Braaten, M. (2008) · Science Education · doi:10.1002/sce.20259 · Cited by 906
Metadata
- Authors
- Sandoval, W. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 5-51
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W2128542449
- Cited by
- 458
- References
- 70
- FWCI
- 92.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327809jls1201_2
- The paper
- Sandoval, W. A. (2003). Conceptual and Epistemic Aspects of Students' Scientific Explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1201_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.