The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom
Abstract
This article develops a situative approach to explaining the transfer of learning, illustrating it using a challenging-to-explain case from a Fostering Communities of Learners classroom. The case involved a group of 5th graders who learned and then transferred a more sophisticated way of explaining species survival and endangerment despite participating in a unit in which many activities designed to foster transfer were short circuited. The explanation included 2 kinds of analyses: (a) how students participated in the learning of relevant content, and (b) how learning contexts were framed interactionally. The content analysis took a situative perspective on commonly investigated transfer mechanisms such as quality of initial learning, engagement with multiple examples, comparison between examples, and formation of generalizations. There was strong evidence for a few of these mechanisms and weak or inconclusive evidence for others. The context analysis explored 2 aspects of the relatively new hypothesis that transfer is more likely to occur when learning contexts are framed as part of a larger ongoing intellectual conversation in which students are actively involved. First, the analysis showed that the teacher worked to frame learning contexts as being temporally connected with other contexts in which the students could use what they were learning. Second, it showed that the teacher worked to frame the students as contributing members of a larger community of people interested in what they were learning about. These and other forms of framing may have encouraged the students to expect that they would be generatively using what they were learning, thus leading them to make better use of the content-based supports for transfer that were available. Thus, this study suggests that coordinating analyses of content with the framing of contexts may be a particularly fruitful approach for developing more comprehensive explanations of how and why the transfer of learning occurs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x018001032 · Cited by 13,645 · cited 1×
“The situative assumption that learning and knowledge are inextricably situated in their social and material contexts (e.g., J. S. Brown, Collins, & Duguid, 1989; Hall, 1996; Lave, 1988) seems to imply that knowledge would be so bound to the initial context of learning that it would be impossible for anyone to ever tra…”
BackgroundFrame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience.
Gamson, W. A., & Goffman, E. (1975) · Contemporary Sociology · doi:10.2307/2064022 · Cited by 10,570
Gumperz, J. J. (1982) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511611834 · Cited by 5,861
Apprenticeship in thinking: cognitive development in social context
(1990) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-0612 · Cited by 5,464
Strategies of Discourse Comprehension
Staczek, J. J., van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1985) · The Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/326517 · Cited by 5,395
Reciprocal Teaching of Comprehension-Fostering and Comprehension-Monitoring Activities
Palinscar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · Cited by 5,186
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Clark, H. H. (1996) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620539 · Cited by 5,123
Apprenticeship in Thinking: Cognitive Development in Social Context
Rogoff, B. (1990) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195059731.001.0001 · Cited by 4,709
Cited by
A research framework of smart education
Zhu, Z.-T., Yu, M.-H., & Riezebos, P. (2016) · Smart Learning Environments · doi:10.1186/s40561-016-0026-2 · Cited by 782
Greeno, J. G., & Engeström, Y. (2014) · The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139519526.009 · Cited by 493
Situated Engineering Learning: Bridging Engineering Education Research and the Learning Sciences
Johri, A., & Olds, B. M. (2011) · Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2011.tb00007.x · Cited by 428
Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education
Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001 · Cited by 408
Lee, S., & Schallert, D. L. (2016) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/j.tate.2016.02.004 · Cited by 102
Metadata
- Authors
- Engle, R. A.
- Venue
- Journal of the Learning Sciences
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2006-10
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 451-498
- ISSN
- 1050-8406 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7809
- OpenAlex
- W2039950151
- Cited by
- 395
- References
- 84
- FWCI
- 29.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2
- The paper
- Engle, R. A. (2006). Framing Interactions to Foster Generative Learning: A Situative Explanation of Transfer in a Community of Learners Classroom. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.