Cited by 408Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesInnovative Education and Learning PracticesScience Education and Pedagogy

Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education

Lipponen, Lasse, Kumpulainen, Kristiina·2011·Teaching and Teacher Education

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 67 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K.
Affiliations
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Finnish National Agency for Education (FI)
Corresponding author
Lipponen, Lasse
Venue
Teaching and Teacher Education
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-07
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
812-819
ISSN
0742-051X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2089058597
Cited by
408
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 12
FWCI
72.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Teaching and Teacher Education (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
temporary agency work, pre-service teachers, teacher professional development, collective inquiry, situated discourse, relational agency, epistemic agency, transformative agency, teacher-student relationship, sociocultural learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review