The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How Emergent Models May Foster the Constitution of Formal Mathematics
Abstract
This article deals with the role that so-called emergent models can play in the process of constituting formal mathematics. The underlying philosophy is that formal mathematics is something that is, or should be, constituted by the students themselves. In the instructional design theory for realistic mathematics education, models always have been employed to foster a process in which formal mathematics is reinvented by the students themselves. This article describes how the use of models became more and more explicated over time and developed into the notion of emergent models. The design of an instructional sequence, which deals with flexible mental computation strategies for addition and subtraction up to 100, is taken as an instance for elaborating what is meant by emergent models and what role they play in fostering the constitution of formal mathematics. The analysis shows that there are 3 interrelated processes. First. at a more holistic level, there is a global transition in which "the model" initially emerges as a model of informal mathematical activity and then gradually develops into a model for more formal mathematical reasoning. Second, the transition from "model of" to "model for" involves the constitution of anew mathematical reality that can be denoted formal in relation to the original starting points of the students. Third, in the series of instructional activities, there is not 1 model, but the model actually is shaped as a series of signs, in which each new sign comes to signify activity with a previous sign in a chain of signification.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sfard, A. (1991) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bf00302715 · Cited by 1,852
Cited by
Learning Trajectories in Mathematics Education
Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2004) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1207/s15327833mtl0602_1 · Cited by 520
Van Den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2003) · Educational Studies in Mathematics · doi:10.1023/b:educ.0000005212.03219.dc · Cited by 503
Systems Modelling and the Development of Coherent Understanding of Cell Biology
Verhoeff, R. P., Waarlo, A. J., & Boersma, K. T. (2008) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500690701237780 · Cited by 176
Pittalis, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Christou, C. (2018) · Mathematical Thinking and Learning · doi:10.1080/10986065.2018.1474533 · Cited by 18
Verhoeff, R. P., Boersma, K. T., & Waarlo, A. J. (2013) · Models and Modeling in Science Education · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4192-8_18 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Gravemeijer, K.
- Venue
- Mathematical Thinking and Learning
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1999-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-177
- ISSN
- 1098-6065 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7833
- OpenAlex
- W2013205797
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How Emergent Models May Foster the Constitution of Formal Mathematics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_4
- The paper
- Gravemeijer, K. (1999). How Emergent Models May Foster the Constitution of Formal Mathematics. Mathematical Thinking and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327833mtl0102_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.