Cited by 64Death Anxiety and Social ExclusionMedia Influence and HealthAesthetic Perception and Analysis

The Appeal of Tragedy: A Terror Management Perspective

Goldenberg, Jamie L., Pyszczynski, Tom, Johnson, Kern D., Greenberg, Jeff, Solomon, Sheldon·1999·Media Psychology

Abstract

The experiment reported in this article assessed the terror management explanation of the appeal of tragedy. From this perspective, vicarious experience of tragedy, such as through film and literature, provides a safe way of approaching the fear associated with one's own mortality. Thus, we hypothesized that reminding participants of their mortality would increase liking for and emotional response to a tragic excerpt from a novel. Participants were randomly assigned to answer open-ended questions about either their own death or a neutral topic and then read two excerpts from Ernest Hemingway novels, one tragic and one nontragic in content. In support of the terror management hypothesis, participants in the mortality salience condition responded more emotionally to, and were more touched by, the tragic excerpt, found the nontragic excerpt less enjoyable, and cared less for the female character in the nontragic passage than did the control participants.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532785xmep0104_2

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When mortality is salient, individuals are particularly likely to appreciate a meaningful film, especially if they highly value search for meaning in life, and to respond emotionally to a tragic literary excerpt.

    “there is evidence that when mortality is salient, individuals are particularly likely to appreciate a meaningful film (Rieger, Frischlich, Hö gden, Kauf, Schramm, & Tappe, 2015), notably if they highly evaluated search for meaning in life (Hofer, 2013), and to respond emotionally to a tragic literary excerpt (Goldenberg, Pyszczynski, Johnson, Greenberg, & Solomon, 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Goldenberg, J. L., Pyszczynski, T., Johnson, K. D., Greenberg, J., & Solomon, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Colorado Colorado Springs (US)
  • Skidmore College (US)
Venue
Media Psychology
Published
1999-12
Volume
1
Issue
4
Pages
313-329
ISSN
  • 1521-3269 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-785X
OpenAlex
W2068873472
Cited by
64
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Media Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
terror management theory, mortality salience, tragedy, vicarious experience, emotional response to fiction, Ernest Hemingway, character identification, fear of death, film and literature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review