Cited by 59Media Influence and HealthDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionAesthetic Perception and Analysis

Appreciation and Enjoyment of Meaningful Entertainment: The Role of Mortality Salience and Search for Meaning in Life

Hofer, Matthias·2013·Journal of Media Psychology

Abstract

Appreciation is an audience response associated with entertainment portrayals concerned with the meaning of life and human existence. Appreciation has been shown to be conceptually and empirically different from enjoyment, which is characterized as pleasure and fun. Drawing upon terror management theory, this research investigates first the influence of reminders of one’s own death on appreciation and enjoyment of a meaningful film and second, the influence of the search for meaning in one’s life on these outcomes. Results of an experimental study (N = 60) showed that mortality salience increased appreciation of a meaningful film, but only for those who rated highly for search for meaning in life. Concerning enjoyment, a reverse pattern was found: Participants who intensely search for meaning in their lives enjoyed the film when their own mortality had not been made salient before watching. Results are discussed in the light of theoretical considerations about entertainment experiences and meaning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1027/1864-1105/a000089

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When mortality is salient, individuals are particularly likely to appreciate a meaningful film, especially if they highly value search for meaning in life, and to respond emotionally to a tragic literary excerpt.

    “there is evidence that when mortality is salient, individuals are particularly likely to appreciate a meaningful film (Rieger, Frischlich, Hö gden, Kauf, Schramm, & Tappe, 2015), notably if they highly evaluated search for meaning in life (Hofer, 2013), and to respond emotionally to a tragic literary excerpt (Goldenberg, Pyszczynski, Johnson, Greenberg, & Solomon, 1999).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hofer, M.
Affiliations
University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Venue
Journal of Media Psychology
Published
2013-01-01
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
109-117
ISSN
  • 1864-1105 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-2388
OpenAlex
W1813144119
Cited by
59
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
50.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Media Psychology Theories Methods and Applications (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
appreciation, enjoyment, mortality salience, terror management theory, search for meaning in life, film viewing, fear of death, audience response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review