Cited by 191Innovative Education and Learning PracticesSocial Representations and IdentityPsychology of Development and Education

Participation as Dis-Identification With/in a Community of Practice

Hodges, Diane Celia·1998·Mind, Culture, and Activity

Abstract

(1998). Participation as Dis-Identification With/in a Community of Practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity: Vol. 5, No. 4, pp. 272-290.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327884mca0504_3

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hodges, D. C.
Corresponding author
Hodges, Diane Celia
Venue
Mind, Culture, and Activity
Published
1998-10
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
272-290
ISSN
  • 1074-9039 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7884
OpenAlex
W2092900213
Cited by
191
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Mind Culture and Activity (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Psychology of Development and Education
Keywords
participation, disidentification, communities of practice, social identity, sense of belonging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review