The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using Activity Theory to Conceptualize Online Community and Using Online Community to Conceptualize Activity Theory
Abstract
In this article we describe the evolving structure of the Inquiry Learning Forum (ILF), a sociotechnical interaction network (STIN) designed to support a Web-based community of in-service and preservice mathematics and science teachers sharing, improving, and creating inquiry-based pedagogical practices. Specifically, we apply activity theory as an analytical lens for characterizing the process of designing and supporting the implementation of this online community. Our findings lend support for three implications. First, activity theory can provide a useful analytical tool for characterizing design activity, especially in terms of illuminating the challenges of designing something like community. Second, as one moves toward trying to design a community, particularly one in which the members will be expected to engage in new practices that challenge their current culture, many tensions emerge. Third, consideration of the ILF as a STIN was a necessary conceptual step in our understanding of the ILF and the transactional nature of people and tools. It is our conception that activity theory and STIN are synergistic theoretical frameworks that, when taken together, can provide a richer view of design activity and community functioning than either can offer in isolation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“An AT perspective on the study of integration of new technologies in education shifts from a focus on tools themselves to tool use (e.g., Benson et al., 2008), or, as Barab et al. (2004) explain, from tools' 'usability' to their 'sociability.'”
From Using activity theory and its principle of contradictions to guide research in educational technology (2008) · cites this paper as Barab et al., 2004
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Engeström, Y. (1993) · Understanding Practice · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511625510.004 · Cited by 853
Barab, S. A., Barnett, M., Yamagata-Lynch, L., Squire, K., & Keating, T. (2002) · Mind, Culture, and Activity · doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0902_02 · Cited by 265 · cited 3×
“These dualities refer to core struggles that are endemic to system activity and that characterize the design struggles of such a system within these dualities, characterizing system activity and driving system innovation (Barab, Barnett, & Squire, 2002; Engeström, 1999).”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1207/S15327809JLS1104_3 · DOI
- Barab S. A., 1999, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 349, 10.1080/10508406.1999.9672074 · DOI
- Barab, S. A. & Duffy, T. (2000). From practice fields to communities of practice. In D. Jonassen & S. M. Land (Eds.), Theoretical foundations of learning environments (pp. 25-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Barab S., 2001, Educational Technology Research and Development, 49, 71, 10.1007/BF02504948 · DOI
- 10.1080/01972240309466 · DOI
- Brown A. L., 1992, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 141, 10.1207/s15327809jls0202_2 · DOI · Paper page
- Dewey, J. & Bentley, A. (1989). Knowing and the known. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), John Dewey: The later works, Volume 16 (pp. 1-279). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press. (Original work published 1949)
- Engestrom, Y. (1994). Teachers as collaborative thinkers: Activity-theoretical study of an innovative teacher team. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal, & S. Vaage (Eds.), Teachers minds and actions: Research on teachers' thinking and practice. London: Falmer.
- Engestrom, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engestrom, R. Miettinin, & R. Punamaki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory (pp. 19-38). New York: Cambridge University Press. · DOI
- Garrison, J. (2001). An introduction to Dewey's theory of functional "trans-action": An alternative paradigm for activity theory. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 8, 275-296. · DOI
- Guba, E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. (1983). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven. & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 311-334). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
- Jonassen D. H., 1999, Educational Technology Research and Development, 47, 61, 10.1007/BF02299477 · DOI
- Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building: Secret strategies for successful online communities on the Web. Berkeley, CA: Peachpit Press.
- Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
- Leont'ev A., 1974, Soviet Psychology, 13, 4, 10.2753/RPO1061-040513024 · DOI
- Leont'ev A., 1989, Soviet Psychology, 27, 22, 10.2753/RPO1061-0405270122 · DOI
- Miettinen, R, (1997). The concept of activity in the analysis of heterogeneous networks in innovation process. CSIT Workshop, "Actor Network and After."Retrieved January 20, 2002, from http://communication.ucsd.edu/MCA/Paper/Reijo/Reijo.html
- Nardi, B. (Ed.). (1996). Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Preece, J. (2000). Online communities: Designing usability, supporting sociability. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
- Schuler, D. & Namioka, A. (Eds.). (1993). Participatory design: Principles and practices. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
- Scriven, M. S. (1983). Evaluation methodologies. In G. F. Madaus, M. S. Scriven, & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), Evaluation models: Viewpoints on educational and human services evaluation (pp. 229-260). Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
- Smith, M. A. & Kollock, P. (Eds.). (1999). Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge. · DOI
- Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns
Barab, S., Thomas, M. K., Dodge, T., Carteaux, R., & Tuzun, H. (2005) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504859 · Cited by 985
Self-citationArdichvili, A. A. (2008) · Advances in Developing Human Resources · doi:10.1177/1523422308319536 · Cited by 509
“A VCoP can be conceptualized as a sociotechnical interaction network, which includes “people, data, equipment, documents and messages, legal arrangement and enforcement mechanisms, and resource flows” (Barab et al., 2004, p. 26).”
BackgroundInfluentialFrom Moodle to Facebook: Exploring students' motivation and experiences in online communities
Deng, L., & Tavares, N. J. (2013) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.04.028 · Cited by 350
Murphy, E., & Rodriguez-Manzanares, M. A. (2008) · Australasian Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.14742/ajet.1203 · Cited by 213
“An AT perspective on the study of integration of new technologies in education shifts from a focus on tools themselves to tool use (e.g., Benson et al., 2008), or, as Barab et al. (2004) explain, from tools’ “usability” to their “sociability.””
MethodCritical Design Ethnography: Designing for Change
Barab, S. A., Thomas, M. K., Dodge, T., Squire, K., & Newell, M. (2004) · Anthropology & Education Quarterly · doi:10.1525/aeq.2004.35.2.254 · Cited by 210
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Barab, S., Schatz, S., & Scheckler, R.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Venue
- Mind, Culture, and Activity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-47
- ISSN
- 1074-9039 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7884
- OpenAlex
- W2055360708
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 12.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Mind Culture and Activity (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- American Educational Research Association
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- activity theory, online communities, design activity, community design, inquiry-based teaching, science and mathematics teachers, online learning communities
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review