The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity
Abstract
This article suggests that the principle of object-relatedness, introduced by Vygotsky and expanded by A. N. Leontiev, can be used to conceptualize human subjectivity within a profoundly social view of human development. This is achieved by reformulating the premises of cultural-historical activity theory to include the notion that material production, intersubjective exchanges, and human subjectivity form a unified three-fold dialectical system. Focusing on the constant manifold transitions among components of this system as its modus vivendi reveals (a) individual and collective processes as being interrelated and co-evolving levels of activity, and (b) the practical relevance of human subjectivity alongside the human relevance of material practices. Such an expanded view posits human subjectivity on a continuum of regulatory mechanisms of social practice, to which both individual and social processes belong. It is further conceptualized as a form of practical transformative pursuits in the world, and as a lawful and necessary moment of human life endowed with the capacity to generate new activity cycles. The co-evolution of collective motives and personal goals, as well as the practical relevance of theoretical constructions, are used as illustrations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815355 · Cited by 35,324
Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life
Lave, J. (1988) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511609268 · Cited by 5,148
Cited by
Vianna, E., & Stetsenko, A. (2011) · Human Development · doi:10.1159/000331484 · Cited by 61
Self-citationAndrews, D., Walton, E., & Osman, R. (2021) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2019.1620880 · Cited by 57
(2010) · Cited by 51
Naidoo, K. (2017) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-016-9550-x · Cited by 17
Spinuzzi, C. (2017) · Mind, Culture, and Activity · doi:10.1080/10749039.2017.1294606 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Stetsenko, A.
- Venue
- Mind, Culture, and Activity
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-88
- ISSN
- 1074-9039 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-7884
- OpenAlex
- W2067480578
- Cited by
- 274
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6
- The paper
- Stetsenko, A. (2005). Activity as Object-Related: Resolving the Dichotomy of Individual and Collective Planes of Activity. Mind, Culture, and Activity. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca1201_6
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.