Cited by 81Psychometric Methodologies and TestingStatistical Methods and ApplicationsMental Health Research Topics

Blurring the Distinctions Between Component Analysis and Common Factor Analysis

Mulaik, Stanley A.·1990·Multivariate Behavioral Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mulaik, S. A.
Affiliations
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Corresponding author
Mulaik, Stanley A.
Venue
Multivariate Behavioral Research
Published
1990-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
53-59
ISSN
  • 0027-3171 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7906
OpenAlex
W2068025782
Cited by
81
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multivariate Behavioral Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
component analysis, common factor analysis, factor analysis, dimensionality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review