Cited by 998Psychometric Methodologies and TestingMental Health Research TopicsStatistical Methods and Applications

Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery.

Velicer, Wayne F., Fava, Joseph L.·1998·Psychological Methods

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/1082-989x.3.2.231

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 97 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L.
Affiliations
University of Rhode Island (US)
Venue
Psychological Methods
Published
1998-06
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
231-251
ISSN
  • 1082-989X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1463
OpenAlex
W2014533626
Cited by
998
References
97
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 47 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 70 · 2019: 49 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 65 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 55 · 2012: 48
FWCI
11.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Psychological Methods (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Applications
Keywords
variable sampling, sample size, factor analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review