CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,249Behavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsPro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 90 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Residual Effects of Past on Later Behavior: Habituation and Reasoned Action Perspectives

Ajzen, Icek·2002·Personality and Social Psychology Review
DOI 10.1207/s15327957pspr0602_02
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The frequency with which a behavior has been performed in the past is found to account for variance in later behavior independent of intentions. This often taken as evidence for habituation of behavior and as complementing the reasoned mode of operation assumed by such models as the theory of planned behavior. In this article, I question the idea that the residual effect of past on later behavior can be attributed to habituation. The habituation perspective cannot account for residual effects in the prediction of low-opportunity behaviors performed in unstable contexts, no accepted independent measure of habit is available, and empirical tests of them habituation hypothesis have so far met with little success. A review of existing evidence suggests that the residual impact of past behavior is attenuated when measures of intention and behavior are compatible and vanishes when intentions are strong and well formed, expectations are implementation have been developed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327957pspr0602_02

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 91 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Bamberg, S., Journal of Basic and Applied Social Psychology
  2. Bargh, J. A., 1989, Unintended thought, 3
  3. Bargh, J. A., 1990, Handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior, 93
  4. Chaiken, S., 1999, Dual-process theories in social psychology
  5. Eagly, A. H., 1993, The psychology of attitudes
  6. Gollwitzer, P. M., 1999, Dual-process theories in social psychology, 403
  7. Ronis, D. L., 1989, Attitude structure and finction, 213
  8. Triandis, H. C., 1977, Interpersonal behavior Monterey

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ajzen, I.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Ajzen, Icek
ORCID
Ajzen, Icek
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2002-05
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
107-122
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
DOI
10.1207/s15327957pspr0602_02
OpenAlex
W2130533816
Cited by
1,249
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 60 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 67 · 2020: 79 · 2019: 69 · 2018: 68 · 2017: 63 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 68 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 58
FWCI
37.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
Keywords
habituation, theory of planned behavior, intention, behavior prediction, implementation intentions, expectations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review