Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,204

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 187 of the 187 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personality, Modernity, and the Storied Self: A Contemporary Framework for Studying Persons

McAdams, Dan P.·1996·Psychological Inquiry
DOI 10.1207/s15327965pli0704_1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

As the scientific study of the individual person, personality psychology historically has struggled to provide the kind of broad conceptual framework capable of orienting theory and research around human individuality in cultural context. This article presents a new integrative framework for studying persons that brings together recent advances in the field of personality with the emerging social science emphasis on the narrative study of lives, while situating personality inquiry within the cultural context of contemporary modernity and the unique problems of the modern self. The frame-work builds on a clear distinction between the "I" and the "Me" features of personality in the modem world and the delineation of three relatively independent levels on which modern persons may be described. In personality, the I may be viewed as the process of "selfing," of narrating experience to create a modern self whereas the Me may be viewed as the self that the I constructs. Personality traits, like those included within the Big Five taxonomy, reside at Level I of personality description and provide a general, comparative, and nonconditional dispositional signature for the person. Level II subsumes tasks, goals, projects, tactics, defenses, values, and other developmental, motivational, and/or strategic concerns that contextualize a person's life in time, place, and role. Speaking directly to the modern problem of reflexively creating a unified and purposeful configuration of the Me, life stories reside at the third level of personality, as internalized integrative narrations of the personal past, present, and future. It is mainly through the psychosocial construction of life stories that modern adults create identity in the Me. Life stories may be examined in terms of their structure and content, function, development, individual differences, and relation to mental health and psychosocial adaptation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15327965pli0704_1

Cites

187 of 187 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 187 references

Research works printed but not linked: 50

  1. 10.1146/annurev.ps.20.020169.001245 · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.20.020169.001245
  2. Baumeister, R. F. (1986). Identity: Cultural change and the struggle for selJ New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Baumeister R. F., 1994, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20, 649, 10.1177/0146167294206003 · doi:10.1177/0146167294206003
  4. Becker, E. (1973). The denial of death. New York: Free Press.
  5. Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A, & Tipton, S. M. (1985). Habits of the heart. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  6. Bennett, W. (Ed.). (1993). The book of virtues. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  7. 10.1037//0022-3514.37.6.1075 · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.6.1075
  8. Bouchard T. J., Jr., 1990, The Minnesota Study of Twins Reared Apart. Science, 250, 223
  9. Cohler, B. J. (1982). Personal narrative and the life course. In P. Baltes & 0. G. Brim, Jr. (Eds.), Life span development and behavior (Vol. 4, pp. 205-241). New York: Academic.
  10. Crowne, D. P. & Marlowe, D. (1964). The approval motive. New York: Wiley.
  11. Daiches, D. (1981). Critical approaches to literature (2nd ed.). Essex, England: Longman.
  12. Davidson, R. J. & Tomarken, A. J. (1989). Laterality and emotion: An electrophysiological approach. In F. Boller & J. Grafman (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 4 1 9 4 1 ) . Amsterdam: Elsevier.
  13. Dollard, J. &Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality andpsychotherapy. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  14. Ellcind, D. (1981). Children and adolescents (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. 10.1037//0022-3514.37.7.1097 · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.37.7.1097 · Paper page
  16. Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York: Norton.
  17. Eysenck, H. J. (1990). Biological dimensions of personality. In L. Penin (Ed.), Handbook of personality theory and research (pp. 244-276). New York: Guilford.
  18. Fairbairn, W. R. D. (1952). Psychoanalytic studies of thepersonality. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  19. Gadlin, H. (1977). Private lives and public order: A critical review of the history of intimate relations in the United States. In G. Levinger & H. L. Rausch (Eds.), Close relationships: Perspectives on the meaning of intimacy (pp. 33-72). Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
  20. Gay, P. (1984). The bourgeois experience: Victoria to Freud.Vol. I : The education of the senses. New York: Oxford University Press.
  21. Gay, P. (1986). The bourgeois experience: Victoria to Freud.Vol. 2: The tender passion. New York: Oxford University Press.
  22. Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 141-166). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  23. 10.1037//0003-066X.48.1.26 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Gray, J. A. (1994). Framework for a taxonomy of psychiatric disorders. In S. H. M. van Goozen, N. E. van de Proll, & J. Sergeant (Eds.), Emotions: Essays on emotion theory (pp. 29-59). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  25. Hall, C. S. &Lindzey, G. (1957). Theoriesofpersonality. New York: Wiley.
  26. Hankiss, A. (1981). On the mythological rearranging of one's life history. In D. Bertaux (Ed.), Biography and society: The life history approach in the social sciences (pp. 203-209). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  27. Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education (3rd ed.). New York: McKay.
  28. 10.1037//0033-295X.94.3.319 · doi:10.1037//0033-295x.94.3.319 · Paper page
  29. 10.1037//0022-3514.63.1.146 · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.63.1.146 · Paper page
  30. Hogan, R. (1987). Personality psychology: Back to basics. In J. Aronoff, A. I. Rabin, & R. A. Zucker (Eds.), The emergence of personality (pp. 79-104). New York: Springer-Verlag.
  31. 10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002443 · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002443
  32. 10.1037//0003-066X.43.1.23 · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.43.1.23 · Paper page
  33. Kohut, H. (1977). The restoration of these& New York: International Universities Press.
  34. Langbaum, R. (1982). The mysteries of identity: A theme in modern literature. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  35. Lewin, K. (1935). A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  36. Liebert, R. M. & Spiegler, M. D. (1990). Personality: Strategiesand issues (6th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: BrooWCole.
  37. Loevinger, J. (1969). Theories of ego development. In L. Breger (Ed.), Clinical-cognitive psychology: Models and integrations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  38. MacIntyre, A. (1984). Afer virtue. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
  39. Maddi, S. (1984). Personology for the 1980s. In R. A. Zucker, J. Aronoff, & A . I. Rabin (Eds.), Personalityand theprediction of behavior (pp. 7-41). New York: Academic.
  40. Marcus, S. (197711. Freud and Dora: Story, history, case history. In T. Shapiro (Ed.), Psychoanalysis and contemporary science (pp. 3 8 9 4 2 ) . New York: International Universities Press.
  41. 10.1037//0003-066X.41.9.954 · doi:10.1037//0003-066x.41.9.954 · Paper page
  42. McAdams, D. P. (1990). Unity and purpose in human lives: The emergence of identity as alife story. In A. I. Rabin, R. A. Zucker, R. A. Emmons, & S. Frank (Eds.), Studying persons and lives (pp. 148-200). New York: Springer.
  43. McAdams, D. P. (1994b). The person: An introduction to personality psychology (2nd ed.). Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.
  44. McAdams, D. P. (1996). Narratingthe self in adulthood. In J. Birren, G. Kenyon, J. E. Ruth, J. J. F. Schraots, & T. Svensson (Eds.), Aging and biography: Explorations in adult development (pp. 131-148). New York: Springer.
  45. McAdams D. P., 1981, Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 27, 219
  46. 10.1037//0882-7974.8.2.221 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1037//0022-3514.50.4.800 · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.50.4.800
  48. Tomkins, S. S. (1987). Script theory. In J. Aronoff, A. I. Rabin, & R. A. Zucker (IEds.), The emergence of personality (pp. 147-216). New York: Springer.
  49. Wiggins, J. S. & Broughton, R. (1985). The interpersonal circle: A structural model for the integration of personality research. In R. Hogan & W. H. Jones (Eds.), Perspectives in personality (Vol. 1, pp. 1-47). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
  50. Winter, D. G. (1973). Thepower motive. New York: Free Press.

Cited by

See all 1,204

Metadata

Authors
McAdams, D. P.
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
1996-10
Volume
7
Issue
4
Pages
295-321
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
DOI
10.1207/s15327965pli0704_1
OpenAlex
W2060772473
Cited by
1,204
References
187
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Personality, Modernity, and the Storied Self: A Contemporary Framework for Studying Persons. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15327965pli0704_1
The paper
McAdams, D. P. (1996). Personality, Modernity, and the Storied Self: A Contemporary Framework for Studying Persons. Psychological Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0704_1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.