Cited by 148EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLanguage, Discourse, Communication Strategies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Spoken fluency revisited

Open access
McCarthy, Michael·2010·English Profile Journal

Abstract

Abstract An important priority for the English Profile programme is to incorporate empirical evidence of the spoken language into the Common European Framework (CEFR). At present, the CEFR descriptors relating to the spoken language include references to fluency and its development as the learner moves from one level to another. This article offers a critique of the monologic bias of much of our current approach to spoken fluency. Fluency undoubtedly involves a degree of automaticity and the ability quickly to retrieve ready-made chunks of language. However, fluency also involves the ability to create flow and smoothness across turn-boundaries and can be seen as an interactive phenomenon in discourse. The article offers corpus evidence for the notion ofconfluence, that is the joint production of flow by more than one speaker, focusing in particular on turn-openings and closings. It considers the implications of an interactive view of fluency for pedagogy, assessment and in the broader social context.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s2041536210000012

Cites

62 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The interlocutor can assist the speaker in maintaining fluency during problem-solving sequences, such as word searches.

    “the interlocutor can assist the speaker in maintaining fluency during problem-solving sequences, such as word searches”

    From The impact of L1 speaking style, task mode, and L2 proficiency on L2 fluency: A within-subject study of monologic and dialogic speech (2025) · cites this paper as McCarthy, 2010

    In “Fluency in pedagogic contexts” (page unavailable), the paper says other participants can intervene during a communication problem to fill silence and maintain the flow. The “Turn-taking” section likewise describes fluency as a shared responsibility. Our copy does not specifically discuss assistance during word searches. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 66 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Evison, Pragmatics of Discourse
  2. 2001, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
McCarthy, M.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
McCarthy, Michael
Venue
English Profile Journal
Published
2010-09-20
Volume
1
ISSN
2041-5362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114707143
Cited by
129
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
33.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
English Profile Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Keywords
speech fluency, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, confluence, interactive discourse, automaticity, English as a foreign language, language assessment, language teaching

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review