The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Development of Reading Efficiency in First and Second Language
Abstract
Efficiency in basic reading processes can be discussed in terms of accuracy and speed. In this longitudinal study, the development of accurate and fast reading processes was studied in a group of 66 children learning to read simultaneously in English, their first language (L1), and Hebrew, their second language (L2). Children's speed and accuracy were compared in Grade 1 and Grade 2 on parallel L1 and L2 tasks of letter naming, reading isolated words and the same words in text. Results indicated that corresponding accuracy and speed across the two languages are highly correlated. Despite differences in language familiarity and different orthographies, accuracy and speed rates of isolated word reading in L1 and L2 were highly similar. Yet, in L1, children were more efficient (faster and more accurate) in reading text than isolated words, but in early stages of L2 reading acquisition, text reading was not more efficient than the reading of isolated words. In terms of efficiency components in L2 language, accuracy distinguished good from poor L2 readers, but speed did not. It is concluded that (a) steps associated with the development of L1 reading efficiency (i.e., accuracy attained before speed) are applicable to the development of word recognition skills in L2, but they do not emerge concurrently in both languages and (b) specific linguistic features such as orthographic depth and morphosyntactic complexity may interact with more global L2 proficiency effects in determining the course of L2 reading skills development.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rapid “automatized” naming (R.A.N.): Dyslexia differentiated from other learning disabilities
Denckla, M. B., & Rudel, R. G. (1976) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/0028-3932(76)90075-0 · Cited by 1,457
Cross-language transfer of phonological awareness.
Durgunoğlu, A. Y., Nagy, W. E., & Hancin-Bhatt, B. J. (1993) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.453 · Cited by 772
Theoretical links among naming speed, precise timing mechanisms and orthographic skill in dyslexia
Bowers, P. G., & Wolf, M. (1993) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/bf01026919 · Cited by 663
Cited by
Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children.
Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9074-x · Cited by 306
Self-citationRamirez, G., Chen, X., Geva, E., & Kiefer, H. (2010) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-009-9203-9 · Cited by 249
Self-citationChung, S. C., Chen, X., & Geva, E. (2019) · Journal of Neurolinguistics · doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.01.003 · Cited by 203
Self-citationNakamoto, J., Lindsey, K. A., & Manis, F. R. (2008) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888430802378526 · Cited by 169
Deacon, S. H., Wade‐Woolley, L., & Kirby, J. R. (2009) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2009.01392.x · Cited by 100
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Geva, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Shany, M.
- Venue
- Scientific Studies of Reading
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1997-04
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 119-144
- ISSN
- 1088-8438 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-799X
- OpenAlex
- W1980787685
- Cited by
- 190
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of Reading Efficiency in First and Second Language. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
- The paper
- Geva, E., Wade-Woolley, L., & Shany, M. (1997). Development of Reading Efficiency in First and Second Language. Scientific Studies of Reading. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0102_2
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.