Cited by 91Reading and Literacy DevelopmentSecond Language Acquisition and LearningLanguage Development and Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Introduction to This Special Issue: The Role of Morphology in Learning to Read

Verhoeven, Ludo, Perfetti, Charles·2003·Scientific Studies of Reading

Abstract

Reading involves the decoding of written forms into language forms that represent phonological, morphological, and word level units. Thus, orthographies convey not only phonological but also morphological information-the word roots, syntactic inflections, and derivational relations that constitute the minimal semantic and grammatical units of a language. There are many psycholinguistic issues brought to light by the facts about morphology. However, the central one has focused on decomposition-whether and how language users, including readers, decompose morphologically complex words into their constituent morphemes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s1532799xssr0703_1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 31

  1. Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs for the Society of Research in Child Development 58(10). · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00027-X · DOI
  3. Berninger, V. W. (Ed.). (1994). The varieties of orthographic knowledge: Theoretical and developmental issues. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. · DOI
  4. 10.1006/jmla.1999.2681 · DOI
  5. Butterworth, B. (1983). Lexical representation. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (Vol. II): Development, writing, and other language processes (pp. 257-294). London: Academic.
  6. Bybee, J. L. (1985). Morphology. A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bybee, J. L. (1988). Morphology as lexical organization. In M. Hammond & M. Noonan (Eds.), Theoretical morphology: Approaches in modern linguistics (pp. 119-141). London: Academic.
  8. Bybee J. L., 1995, Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425, 10.1080/01690969508407111 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90017-0 · DOI
  10. Carlisle, J. F. (1995). Morphological awareness and early reading achievement. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 189-209). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  11. 10.1023/A:1008168902922 · DOI
  12. Carlisle J. F., 1993, Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 177, 10.1017/S0142716400009541 · DOI
  13. Derwing, B. L., Smith, M. L. & Wiebe, G. E. (1995). On the role of spelling in morpheme recognition: Experimental studies with children and adults. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 3-27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  14. Fowler, A. E. & Lieberman, I. Y. (1995). The role of phonology and orthography in morphological awareness. In L. B. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 157-188). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  15. 10.1006/brln.2001.2546 · DOI
  16. 10.1023/A:1008168902922 · DOI
  17. Manelis L., 1977, Memory & Cognition, 5, 690, 10.3758/BF03197417 · DOI
  18. 10.1023/A:1008190908857 · DOI
  19. Nagy W. E., 1984, Reading Research Quarterly, 19, 304, 10.2307/747823 · DOI
  20. Nagy W., 1993, Journal of Reading Behavior, 25, 155, 10.1080/10862969309547808 · DOI
  21. Nagy W. E., 1990, Cognition and Instruction, 7, 105, 10.1207/s1532690xci0702_2 · DOI
  22. Paap K. R., 1991, Psychological Bulletin, 53, 13
  23. Schreuder, R. & Baayen, R. H. (1995). Modeling morphological processing. In L. Feldman (Ed.), Morphological aspects of language processing (pp. 131-157). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  24. 10.1006/jmla.1997.2510 · DOI
  25. Taft M., 1981, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 289, 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90439-4 · DOI
  26. Taft M., 1994, Language and Cognitive Processes, 9, 271, 10.1080/01690969408402120 · DOI
  27. Taft M., 1975, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638, 10.1016/S0022-5371(75)80051-X · DOI
  28. Taft M., 1976, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 15, 607, 10.1016/0022-5371(76)90054-2 · DOI
  29. Templeton, S. & Morris, D. (2000). Spelling. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Rosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research. Vol. III (pp. 525-543). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  30. Treiman, R. (1992). The role of intrasyllabic units in learning to read. In P. B. Gough, L. C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 65-106). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  31. Tyler A., 1989, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 638

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Verhoeven, L., & Perfetti, C.
Affiliations
Radboud University Nijmegen (NL)
Venue
Scientific Studies of Reading
Published
2003-07
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
209-217
ISSN
  • 1088-8438 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-799X
OpenAlex
W2097517143
Cited by
91
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scientific Studies of Reading (publishedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
morphology (linguistics), reading acquisition, morphological decomposition, morphemes, orthography, word recognition, derivational morphology, inflectional morphology, psycholinguistics of reading

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review