The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Learning to Read Words: Theory, Findings, and Issues
Abstract
Reading words may take several forms. Readers may utilize decoding, analogizing, or predicting to read unfamiliar words. Readers read familiar words by accessing them in memory, called sight word reading. With practice, all words come to be read automatically by sight, which is the most efficient, unobtrusive way to read words in text. The process of learning sight words involves forming connections between graphemes and phonemes to bond spellings of the words to their pronunciations and meanings in memory. The process is enabled by phonemic awareness and by knowledge of the alphabetic system, which functions as a powerful mnemonic to secure spellings in memory. Recent studies show that alphabetic knowledge enhances children's learning of new vocabulary words, and it influences their memory for doubled letters in words. Four phases characterize the course of development of sight word learning. The phases are distinguished according to the type of alphabetic knowledge used to form connections: pre-alphabetic, partial, full, and consolidated alphabetic phases. These processes appear to portray sight word learning in transparent as well as opaque writing systems.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies
Seymour, P. H. K., Aro, M., Erskine, J. M., & collaboration with COST Action A8 network (2003) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1348/000712603321661859 · Cited by 2,601
Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: a direct test of the self-teaching hypothesis
Share, D. L. (1999) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1006/jecp.1998.2481 · Cited by 742
Cited by
Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert
Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100618772271 · Cited by 1,297
What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension.
Ouellette, G. P. (2006) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554 · Cited by 1,027
Examining dimensions of self-efficacy for writing
Bruning, R., Dempsey, M., Kauffman, D. F., McKim, C., & Zumbrunn, S. (2013) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029692 · Cited by 470
The Simple View of Reading: Is It Valid for Different Types of Alphabetic Orthographies?
Florit, E., & Cain, K. (2011) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-011-9175-6 · Cited by 406
Textual paralanguage and its implications for marketing communications
Luangrath, A. W., Peck, J., & Barger, V. A. (2017) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2016.05.002 · Cited by 221
Metadata
- Authors
- Ehri, L. C.
- Venue
- Scientific Studies of Reading
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2005-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-188
- ISSN
- 1088-8438 (ISSN-L)
- 1532-799X
- OpenAlex
- W2057858168
- Cited by
- 1,411
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 35.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Learning to Read Words: Theory, Findings, and Issues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
- The paper
- Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to Read Words: Theory, Findings, and Issues. Scientific Studies of Reading. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0902_4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.