The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Viewer Aggression and Homophily, Identification, and Parasocial Relationships With Television Characters
Abstract
This study examined the antecedents of viewer relationships experienced with television characters. Based on social cognitive theory, we considered how trait aggression helped explain identification, hornophily, and parasocial interaction with aggressive characters. Two hundred nineteen participants completed questionnaires measuring trait aggression and relationships with one of eight characters. We content analyzed portrayals of these characters to determine their levels of aggression. Results suggested viewer aggression predicted identification with aggressive characters, but did not predict hornophily and parasocial interaction beyond the variance explained by gender. We also observed relationships among the dependent variables and differences between physical and verbal aggression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mass Communication and Para-Social Interaction
Horton, D., & Richard Wohl, R. (1956) · Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/00332747.1956.11023049 · Cited by 4,380
Attribution in Social and Parasocial Relationships
PERSE, E. M., & RUBIN, R. B. (1989) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/009365089016001003 · Cited by 559
Cognitive Social Learning Mediators of Aggression
Perry, D. G., Perry, L. C., & Rasmussen, P. (1986) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130347 · Cited by 441
Cited by
Sokolova, K., & Kefi, H. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.01.011 · Cited by 1,650
Moyer-Gusé, E. (2008) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.2008.00328.x · Cited by 1,365
Ladhari, R., Massa, E., & Skandrani, H. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027 · Cited by 557
The greatest magic of Harry Potter: Reducing prejudice
Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., & Trifiletti, E. (2015) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12279 · Cited by 228
Influencer Marketing: Role of Influencer Credibility and Congruence on Brand Attitude and eWOM
Dhun, & Dangi, H. K. (2023) · Journal of Internet Commerce · doi:10.1080/15332861.2022.2125220 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Eyal, K., & Rubin, A. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-98
- ISSN
- 0883-8151 (ISSN-L)
- 1550-6878
- OpenAlex
- W1994189725
- Cited by
- 424
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 71.05
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Viewer Aggression and Homophily, Identification, and Parasocial Relationships With Television Characters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5
- The paper
- Eyal, K., & Rubin, A. M. (2003). Viewer Aggression and Homophily, Identification, and Parasocial Relationships With Television Characters. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
