Cited by 557Digital Marketing and Social MediaConsumer Perception and Purchasing BehaviorConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise

Ladhari, Riadh, Massa, Elodie, Skandrani, Hamida·2020·Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 59

  1. Al-Natour, 2011, The adoption of online shopping assistants: perceived similarity as an antecedent to evaluative beliefs, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst., 12, 347
  2. Alalwan, 2017, Social media in marketing: a review and analysis of the existing literature, Telematics Inf., 34, 1177, 10.1016/j.tele.2017.05.008 · DOI
  3. Alves, 2016, Social media marketing: a literature review and implications, Psychol. Mark., 33, 1029, 10.1002/mar.20936 · DOI
  4. Amos, 2008, Exploring the relationship between celebrity endorser effects and advertising effectiveness: a quantitative synthesis of effect size, Int. J. Advert., 27, 209, 10.1080/02650487.2008.11073052 · DOI
  5. Arora, 2019, Measuring social media influencer index-insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 49, 86, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.012 · DOI
  6. Bagozzi, 1999, The role of emotions in marketing, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 27, 184, 10.1177/0092070399272005 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bergkvist, 2016, Celebrity endorsements: a literature review and research agenda, Int. J. Advert., 35, 642, 10.1080/02650487.2015.1137537 · DOI
  8. Berry, 2000, Cultivating service brand equity, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., 28, 128, 10.1177/0092070300281012 · DOI
  9. Burton, 2000, Ethnicity, identity and marketing: a critical review, J. Mark. Manag., 16, 853
  10. Chae, 2019, YouTube makeup tutorials reinforce postfeminist beliefs through social comparison, Media Psychol.
  11. Chapple, 2017, An investigation into viewers' trust in and response towards disclosed paid-for-endorsements by YouTube lifestyle vloggers, Journal of Promotional Communications, 5, 110
  12. Chu, 2011, Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites, Int. J. Advert., 30, 47, 10.2501/IJA-30-1-047-075 · DOI
  13. Chung, 2017, Fostering parasocial relationships with celebrities on social media: implications for celebrity endorsement, Psychol. Mark., 34, 481, 10.1002/mar.21001 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Danniswara, 2017, The impact of eWOM referral, celebrity endorsement, and information quality on purchase decision: A case of Instagram, Inf. Resour. Manag. J., 30, 23, 10.4018/IRMJ.2017040102 · DOI
  15. Djafarova, 2017, Exploring the credibility of online celebrities' Instagram profiles in influencing the purchase decisions of young female users, Comput. Hum. Behav., 68, 1, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.009 · DOI
  16. Dwivedi, 2015, Social media marketing and advertising, Mark. Rev., 15, 289, 10.1362/146934715X14441363377999 · DOI
  17. Dwivedi, 2018, Consumer emotional brand attachment with social media brands and social media brand equity, Eur. J. Market.
  18. Erdogan, 1999, Celebrity endorsement: a literature review, J. Mark. Manag., 15, 291
  19. Eyal, 2003, Viewer aggression and homophily, identification, and parasocial relationships with television characters, J. Broadcast. Electron. Media, 77, 10.1207/s15506878jobem4701_5 · DOI
  20. Gannon, 2018, Beauty bloggers and YouTubers as a community of practice, J. Mark. Manag., 34, 592
  21. Hanks, 2017, Status seeking and perceived similarity: a consideration of homophily in the social servicescape, Int. J. Hosp. Manag., 60, 123, 10.1016/j.ijhm.2016.10.007 · DOI
  22. Harnish, 2016, Mall haul videos: self‐presentational motives and the role of self‐monitoring, Psychol. Mark., 33, 113, 10.1002/mar.20858 · DOI
  23. Hill, 2017, Signalling effects of vlogger popularity on online consumers, J. Comput. Inf. Syst., 1
  24. Hsu, 2013, The effects of blogger recommendations on customers' online shopping intentions, Internet Res., 23, 69, 10.1108/10662241311295782 · DOI
  25. Hu, 2016, The influence of peer characteristics and technical features of a social shopping website on a consumer's purchase intention, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 36, 1218
  26. Huang, 2009, Searching for experience on the web: an empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods, J. Mark., 73, 55, 10.1509/jmkg.73.2.55 · DOI
  27. Ismagilova, 2019, The effect of characteristics of source credibility on consumer behaviour: a meta-analysis, J. Retail. Consum. Serv.
  28. Ismagilova, 2019, The effect of electronic word of mouth communications on intention to buy: a meta-analysis, Inf. Syst. Front.
  29. Jiménez-Castillo, 2019, The role of digital influencers in brand recommendation: examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 49, 366
  30. Jin, 2014, Following celebrities' tweets about brands: the impact of twitter-based electronic word-of-mouth on consumers' source credibility perception, buying intention, and social identification with celebrities, J. Advert., 43, 181, 10.1080/00913367.2013.827606 · DOI
  31. Kees, 2017, An analysis of data quality: professional panels, student subject pools, and Amazon's Mechanical Turk, J. Advert., 46, 141, 10.1080/00913367.2016.1269304 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Kelman, 1958, Compliance, identification, and internalization: three processes of attitude change, J. Confl. Resolut., 2, 51, 10.1177/002200275800200106 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Kim, 2011, The effects of athlete-endorsed advertising: the moderating role of the athlete-audience ethnicity match, J. Sport Manag., 25, 143, 10.1123/jsm.25.2.143 · DOI
  34. Kim, 2018, The influence of eWOM communications: an application of online social network framework, Comput. Hum. Behav., 80, 243, 10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.015 · DOI
  35. Kowalczyk, 2016, Transforming celebrities through social media: the role of authenticity and emotional attachment, J. Prod. Brand Manag., 25, 345, 10.1108/JPBM-09-2015-0969 · DOI
  36. Lazarsfeld, 1954, Friendship as a social process: a substantive and methodological analysis, Freedom and control in modern society, 18, 18
  37. Lee, 2016, YouTube vloggers' influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions, J. Bus. Res., 69, 5753, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.171 · DOI
  38. Li, 2011, Who is talking? An ontology-based opinion leader identification framework for word-of-mouth marketing in online social blogs, Decis. Support Syst., 51, 190, 10.1016/j.dss.2010.12.007 · DOI
  39. Lin, 2010, Blog popularity mining using social interconnection analysis, IEEE Internet Computing, 14, 41
  40. Liu, 2019, Vlog and brand evaluations: the influence of parasocial interaction, Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist., 31, 419, 10.1108/APJML-01-2018-0021 · DOI
  41. Mardon, 2018, YouTube Beauty Gurus and the emotional labour of tribal entrepreneurship, J. Bus. Res., 92, 443, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.04.017 · DOI
  42. McCraken, 1989, Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process, J. Consum. Res., 16, 310, 10.1086/209217 · DOI · Paper page
  43. McCroskey, 1975, The development of a measure of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication, Hum. Commun. Res., 1, 323, 10.1111/j.1468-2958.1975.tb00281.x · DOI
  44. Munnukka, 2019, “Thanks for watching”. The effectiveness of YouTube vlog endorsements, Comput. Hum. Behav., 93, 226, 10.1016/j.chb.2018.12.014 · DOI
  45. Ohanian, 1991, The impact of celebrity spokespersons' perceived image on consumers' intention to purchase, J. Advert. Res., 31, 46, 10.1080/00218499.1991.12466759 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Park, 2020, The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement, J. Retail. Consum. Serv., 52, 101934, 10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101934 · DOI
  47. Sakib, 2019, Does parasocial interaction with weight loss vloggers affect compliance? The role of vlogger characteristics, consumer readiness, and health consciousness, J. Retail. Consum. Serv.
  48. Shang, 2017, Generating consumer resonance for purchase intention on social network sites, Comput. Hum. Behav., 69, 18, 10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.014 · DOI
  49. Shen, 2010, Virtual community loyalty: an interpersonal-interaction perspective, Int. J. Electron. Commer., 15, 49, 10.2753/JEC1086-4415150102 · DOI
  50. Sokolova, 2019, Instagram and YouTube bloggers promote it, why should I buy? How credibility and parasocial interaction influence purchase intentions, J. Retail. Consum. Serv.
  51. Steffes, 2009, Social ties and online word of mouth, Internet Res., 19, 42, 10.1108/10662240910927812 · DOI
  52. Thomson, 2006, Human brands: investigating antecedents to consumers’ strong attachments to celebrities, J. Mark., 70, 104, 10.1509/jmkg.70.3.104 · DOI
  53. Tynan, 2009, Experience marketing: a review and reassessment, J. Mark. Manag., 25, 501
  54. Uribe, 2016, Sidedness, commercial intent and expertise in blog advertising, J. Bus. Res., 69, 4403, 10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.102 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Venkatesh, 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies, Manag. Sci., 46, 186, 10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Wang, 2008, Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the internet: web sites versus discussion groups, Health Commun., 23, 358, 10.1080/10410230802229738 · DOI
  57. Zhang, 2014, Examining the moderating effect of inconsistent reviews and its gender differences on consumers' online shopping decision, Int. J. Inf. Manag., 34, 89
  58. Yang, 2015, Social sharing of online videos: Examining American consumers’ video sharing attitudes, intent, and behavior, Psychol. Mark., 32, 907, 10.1002/mar.20826 · DOI
  59. Zhang, 2018, Can consumers be persuaded on brand microblogs? An empirical study, Inf. Manag., 55, 1, 10.1016/j.im.2017.03.005 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ladhari, R., Massa, E., & Skandrani, H.
Affiliations
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Manouba University (TN)
Corresponding author
Ladhari, Riadh
Venue
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-05
Volume
54
Pages
102027
ISSN
0969-6989 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2996863103
Cited by
557
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 69 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 134 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 77 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 16
FWCI
69.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Digital Marketing and Social Media
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Perception and Purchasing Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
YouTube vloggers, influencer popularity, homophily, emotional attachment, expertise, credibility, purchase decision, cosmetics, social media influencers, consumer behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review