Cited by 240Social and Intergroup PsychologyMedia Influence and HealthThemes in Literature Analysis

The greatest magic of H arry P otter: Reducing prejudice

Open access
Vezzali, Loris, Stathi, Sofia, Giovannini, Dino, Capozza, Dora, Trifiletti, Elena·2015·Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Abstract

Recent research shows that extended contact via story reading is a powerful strategy to improve out‐group attitudes. We conducted three studies to test whether extended contact through reading the popular best‐selling books of H arry P otter improves attitudes toward stigmatized groups (immigrants, homosexuals, refugees). Results from one experimental intervention with elementary school children and from two cross‐sectional studies with high school and university students (in I taly and U nited K ingdom) supported our main hypothesis. Identification with the main character (i.e., H arry P otter) and disidentification from the negative character (i.e., V oldemort) moderated the effect. Perspective taking emerged as the process allowing attitude improvement. Theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed in the context of extended intergroup contact and social cognitive theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jasp.12279

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Books can facilitate connections with real life others, for example, by enriching understanding of others and/or developing relationships with those who have shared reading interests and/or experiences.

    “In addition to connecting with fictional characters, books can also facilitate connections with real life others, for example, by enriching understanding of others and/or developing relationships with those who have shared reading interests and/or experiences (Merga, 2014; Sellers, 2019; Vezzali et al., 2015).”

    From How Does Reading Fiction Support Adolescents’ Wellbeing? A Qualitative Study Examining Positive Affect, Connection and Personal Growth (2025) · cites this paper as Vezzali et al., 2015

    The Theoretical implications section reports that reading about Harry Potter’s interactions with stigmatized characters may help readers understand disadvantaged real-world groups. The Practical implications section suggests discussion groups after reading, but our copy does not show that books develop relationships between people with shared reading interests or experiences. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Adolescents recognized the potential of fiction reading for developing empathy and helping them to understand others.

    “In addition to fiction providing a means of better understanding themselves, adolescents also recognized the potential of fiction reading for developing empathy and helping them to understand others (Djikic et  al., 2013; Eekhof et  al., 2022; Vezzali et  al., 2015).”

    From How Does Reading Fiction Support Adolescents’ Wellbeing? A Qualitative Study Examining Positive Affect, Connection and Personal Growth (2025) · cites this paper as Vezzali et al., 2015

    The Theoretical implications section reports that reading Harry Potter was associated with perspective-taking toward stigmatized groups, which supports the idea that fiction can help readers understand others. But the paper does not report adolescents recognizing that potential themselves; its adolescent study used questionnaires about Harry Potter and social attitudes (Participants and Procedure, page unavailable). The authors also say they did not assess whether reading improved a general ability to understand others’ inner lives. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. In E. E. Heilman (Ed.), Critical perspectives on Harry Potter (2 nd ed.) (pp. 199-223). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
  2. Beers, M. J., & Apple, K. J. (2006). Intergroup conflict in the world of Harry Potter. In N. Mulholland (Ed.), The psychology of Harry Potter (pp. 33-44). Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.
  3. Franklin, N. (2006). The social dynamics of power and cooperation in the wizarding world. In N. Mulholland (Ed.), The psychology of Harry Potter (pp. 169-174).
  4. Liebkind, K., & McAlister, A. L. (1999). Extended contact through peer modelling to promote tolerance in Finland. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29, 765-780.
  5. Mulholland, N. (Ed.) (2006). The psychology of Harry Potter. Dallas, TX: BenBella Books.
  6. Paluck, E. L., & Green, D. P. (2009). Prejudice reduction: What works? A critical look at evidence from the field and the laboratory. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 339- 367.
  7. Rowling, J. K. (1998). Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets. London, UK: Bloomsbury.
  8. Senland, A., & Vozzola, E. (2007). Christian perspectives on Harry Potter: Tool of Satan or Christian parable? Journal of Research in Character Education, 5, 149-165.
  9. Turner, R. N., Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Kenworthy, J., & Cairns, E. (2013). Contact between Catholic and Protestant schoolchildren in Northern Ireland. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43 (Suppl. 2), E216-E228.
  10. Vezzali, L., Hewstone, M., Capozza, D., Giovannini, D., & Wöelfer, R. (2014). Improving intergroup relations with extended and vicarious contact: An integrative review. Under review.
  11. Whitney, M. P., Vozzola, E. C., & Hofmann, J. (2005). Children's moral reading of Harry Potter: Are children and adults reading the same books? Journal of Research in Character Education, 3, 1-24.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., & Trifiletti, E.
Affiliations
  • University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
  • University of Greenwich (GB)
  • University of Padua (IT)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Vezzali, Loris
Venue
Journal of Applied Social Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-07-23
Volume
45
Issue
2
Pages
105-121
ISSN
  • 0021-9029 (ISSN-L)
  • 1559-1816
OpenAlex
W1658184466
Cited by
228
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
49.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Applied Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Greenwich Academic Literature Archive (University of Greenwich) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Themes in Literature Analysis
Keywords
Harry Potter, extended contact, prejudice reduction, outgroup attitudes, stigmatized groups, perspective taking, identification with protagonist, disidentification, social cognitive theory, intergroup contact, immigrants, homosexuals, refugees

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review