The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking
Open accessAbstract
Two studies investigated the interaction between utterance and scene processing by monitoring eye movements in agent–action–patient events, while participants listened to related utterances. The aim of Experiment 1 was to determine if and when depicted events are used for thematic role assignment and structural disambiguation of temporarily ambiguous English sentences. Shortly after the verb identified relevant depicted actions, eye movements in the event scenes revealed disambiguation. Experiment 2 investigated the relative importance of linguistic/world knowledge and scene information. When the verb identified either only the stereotypical agent of a (nondepicted) action, or the (nonstereotypical) agent of a depicted action as relevant, verb‐based thematic knowledge and depicted action each rapidly influenced comprehension. In contrast, when the verb identified both of these agents as relevant, the gaze pattern suggested a preferred reliance of comprehension on depicted events over stereotypical thematic knowledge for thematic interpretation. We relate our findings to language comprehension and acquisition theories.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Structural Sources of Verb Meanings
Gleitman, L. (1990) · Language Acquisition · doi:10.1207/s15327817la0101_2 · Cited by 1,783
Probabilistic constraints and syntactic ambiguity resolution
MacDonald, M. C. (1994) · Language and Cognitive Processes · doi:10.1080/01690969408402115 · Cited by 379
The Role of Lexical Frequency in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution
Trueswell, J. C. (1996) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1006/jmla.1996.0030 · Cited by 277
Cited by
An integrated theory of language production and comprehension
Pickering, M. J., & Garrod, S. (2013) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x12001495 · Cited by 1,569
Predicting while comprehending language: A theory and review.
Pickering, M. J., & Gambi, C. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000158 · Cited by 518
Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2007) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.12.004 · Cited by 434
The time course of anticipatory constraint integration
Kukona, A., Fang, S.-Y., Aicher, K. A., Chen, H., & Magnuson, J. S. (2011) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.12.002 · Cited by 139
“Our findings are complementary to those of Knoeferle and Crocker ( 2006 , 2007 ) .”
BackgroundResultInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2006-05
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 481-529
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- 1551-6709
- OpenAlex
- W2170796869
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65
- The paper
- Knoeferle, P., & Crocker, M. W. (2006). The Coordinated Interplay of Scene, Utterance, and World Knowledge: Evidence From Eye Tracking. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_65
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.