The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry
Open accessAbstract
We present a new model of skilled performance in geometry proof problem solving called the Diagram Configuration model (DC). While previous models plan proofs in a step-by-step fashion, we observed that experts plan at a more abstract level: They focus on the key steps and skip the less important ones. DC models this abstract planning behavior by parsing geometry problem diagrams into perceptual chunks, called diagram configurations, which cue relevant schematic knowledge. We provide verbal protocol evidence that DC's schemas correspond with the step-skipping inferences experts make in their initial planning. We compare DC with other models of geometry expertise and then, in the final section, we discuss more general implications of our research. DC's reasoning has important similarities with Larkin's (1988) display-based reasoning approach and Johnson-Laird's (1983) mental model approach. DC's perceptually based schemas are a step towards a unified explanation of (1) experts' superior problem-solving effectiveness, (2) experts' superior problem-state memory, and (3) experts' ability, in certain domains, to solve relatively simple problems by pure forward inferencing. We also argue that the particular and efficient knowledge organization of DC challenges current theories of skill acquisition as it presents an end-state of learning that is difficult to explain within such theories. Finally, we discuss the implications of DC for geometry instruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning
Sweller, J. (1988) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7 · Cited by 11,048
Principles of Artificial Intelligence
Nilsson, N. J. (1982) · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-09438-9 · Cited by 3,457 · cited 1×
“In the field of problem solving this is known as the formation of macro-operators (Korf, 1987; Nilsson, 1980).”
BackgroundCheng, P. W., & Holyoak, K. J. (1985) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(85)90014-3 · Cited by 1,463
YOU CAN'T PLAY 20 QUESTIONS WITH NATURE AND WIN: PROJECTIVE COMMENTS ON THE PAPERS OF THIS SYMPOSIUM
Newell, A. (1973) · Visual Information Processing · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-170150-5.50012-3 · Cited by 820 · cited 3×
“While it is true, as Newell and Simon (1972) pointed out, that there are multiple possible problem spaces for any problem, there is one problem space for geometry which is perhaps the most natural extension of the way geometry is typically taught.”
BackgroundInfluentialChunking in recall of symbolic drawings
Egan, D. E., & Schwartz, B. J. (1979) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197595 · Cited by 482
A simulation of memory for chess positions
Simon, H. A., & Gilmartin, K. (1973) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(73)90024-8 · Cited by 439
Development of expertise in mathematical problem solving.
Sweller, J., Mawer, R. F., & Ward, M. R. (1983) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.112.4.639 · Cited by 258
Cited by
Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design
Sweller, J. (1994) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5 · Cited by 3,801
On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models
Bommasani, R., Hudson, D. A., Adeli, E., Altman, R., Arora, S., von Arx, S., Bernstein, M. S., Bohg, J., Bosselut, A., Brunskill, E., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2108.07258 · Cited by 2,676
Cognitive Tutors: Lessons Learned
Anderson, J. R., Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Pelletier, R. (1995) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0402_2 · Cited by 1,982
Self-citationWhy Some Material Is Difficult to Learn
Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994) · Cognition and Instruction · doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1203_1 · Cited by 1,455
External cognition: how do graphical representations work?
Scaife, M., & Rogers, Y. (1996) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1006/ijhc.1996.0048 · Cited by 1,066
Metadata
- Authors
- Koedinger, K.
- Venue
- Cognitive Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 511-550
- ISSN
- 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982250324
- Cited by
- 375
- References
- 7
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0364-0213(90)90008-k
- The paper
- Koedinger, K. (1990). Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: Elements of expertise in geometry. Cognitive Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(90)90008-k
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.