Cited by 1,451Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsNeural Networks and ApplicationsMotor Control and Adaptation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Forward Models: Supervised Learning with a Distal Teacher

Jordan, Michael I., Rumelhart, David E.·1992·Cognitive Science

Abstract

Internal models of the environment have an important role to play in adaptive systems, in general, and are of particular importance for the supervised learning paradigm. In this article we demonstrate that certain classical problems associated with the notion of the “teacher” in supervised learning can be solved by judicious use of learned internal models as components of the adaptive system. In particular, we show how supervised learning algorithms can be utilized in cases in which an unknown dynamical system intervenes between actions and desired outcomes. Our approach applies to any supervised learning algorithm that is capable of learning in multilayer networks.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1207/s15516709cog1603_1

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Barto A.G., 1989, The computing neurone
  2. Gelfand I.M., 1963, Calculus of variations
  3. Hinton G.E., 1986, Parallel distributed processing
  4. Jordan M.I., 1983, Mental practice
  5. LeCun Y., 1985, Learning scheme for asymmetric threshold networks, Proceedings of Cognitiva, 85
  6. LeCun Y., 1987, Modéles connexionnistes de I'apprentissage
  7. Mozer M.C., 1990, Advances in neural information processing systems
  8. Munro P., 1987, Proceedings of the Ninth Conference of the Cognitive Science Society
  9. Parker D., 1985, Learning logic
  10. Robinson A.J., 1989, Proceedings of Neural Information Systems
  11. Rumelhart D.E., 1986, Parallel distributed processing, 10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Rumelhart D.E., 1986, Parallel distributed processing, 10.7551/mitpress/5236.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

Metadata

Authors
Jordan, M. I., & Rumelhart, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
Jordan, Michael I.
Venue
Cognitive Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1992-07
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
307-354
ISSN
  • 0364-0213 (ISSN-L)
  • 1551-6709
OpenAlex
W2043968544
Cited by
1,451
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 47 · 2019: 65 · 2018: 54 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 47
FWCI
66.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
forward model, internal models, supervised learning, adaptive systems, learned models, multilayer networks, dynamical systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review