Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 828

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 205 of the 205 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Masses*

KLOOS, RICHARD T., GROSS, MILTON D., FRANCIS, ISAAC R., KOROBKIN, MELVYN, SHAPIRO, BRAHM·1995·Endocrine Reviews

Abstract

Independently, endocrinology, radiology, and nuclear medicine can not optimally differentiate the etiology of the incidental adrenal mass. Rather, the insight necessary for this task must be contributed by all three disciplines. Incidentally discovered adrenal masses are being detected at an increasing rate. This trend is expected to continue based on the incidence of adrenal masses in autopsy series and the increasing use of high resolution abdominal imaging techniques. CT and MRI are able to definitely characterize only a minority of these lesions (simple cyst, myelolipoma, obvious local malignant invasion). Biochemical screening for hormone excess is essential regardless of a nonsuggestive complete history and physical examination. An argument may be made for not further pursuing nonhypersecreting lesions with the typical features of a benign adenoma on CT scan and an attenuation value of 0 HU or less. Adrenocortical scintigraphy is recommended in all patients with normal biochemical screening tests, especially those with CT attenuation values greater than 0 HU. In this setting, we believe that the functional and anatomical information provided by NP-59 and [75Se]selenomethylnorcholesterol scintigraphy allows one to noninvasively, accurately, and less expensively (Table 9) categorize adrenal masses as benign nonhypersecretory adenomas (the vast majority) vs. a possibly malignant lesion (the minority). In the presence of normal biochemistry, a concordant NP-59 imaging pattern is diagnostic of a nonhypersecretory benign adrenal adenoma and requires no immediate therapeutic intervention. Conversely, patients with discordant patterns of NP-59 scintigraphy have lesions that carry a significant risk for malignancy, and the pursuit of a tissue diagnosis is indicated, usually by means of FNA. Normal adrenocortical tissue on cytological studies in this setting may represent inadvertent sampling of adjacent normal adrenocortical tissues or the presence of a well differentiated adrenocortical carcinoma. In patients with lesions larger than 2 cm in whom NP-59 scintigraphy is nonlateralizing, the possibility of a periadrenal or pseudoadrenal mass is likely and should prompt review, or perhaps even repeat, of high resolution adrenal imaging (occasionally angiography may be helpful). In lesions shown to be 2 cm or less in size with a nonlateralizing NP-59-scan, there is a possibility of a periadrenal or pseudoadrenal mass; however, once this is excluded it must be recognized that benign and malignant lesions, because of the limitations of scintigraphy, cannot always be clearly distinguished by this method when masses are small.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/edrv-16-4-460

Cites

205 of 205 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 205 references

Cited by

See all 828

Metadata

Authors
KLOOS, R. T., GROSS, M. D., FRANCIS, I. R., KOROBKIN, M., & SHAPIRO, B.
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
1995-08
Volume
16
Issue
4
Pages
460-484
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W2059783931
Cited by
828
References
205
FWCI
19.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Masses*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/edrv-16-4-460
The paper
KLOOS, R. T., GROSS, M. D., FRANCIS, I. R., KOROBKIN, M., & SHAPIRO, B. (1995). Incidentally Discovered Adrenal Masses*. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/edrv-16-4-460

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.