Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 400

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 313 of the 313 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Estrogen Receptor Mutations in Human Disease

Open access
Herynk, Matthew H., Fuqua, Suzanne A. W.·2004·Endocrine Reviews

Abstract

As early as the 1800s, the actions of estrogen have been implicated in the development and progression of breast cancer.The estrogen receptor (ER) was identified in the late 1950s and purified a few years later.However, it was not until the 1980s that the first ER was molecularly cloned, and in the mid 1990s, a second ER was cloned.These two related receptors are now called ER␣ and ER␤, respectively.Since their discovery, much research has focused on identifying alterations within the coding sequence of these receptors in clinical samples.As a result, a large number of naturally occurring splice variants of both ER␣ and ER␤ have been identified in normal epithelium and diseased or cancerous tissues.In contrast, only a few point mutations have been identified in human patient samples from a variety of disease states, including breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and psychiatric diseases.To elucidate the mechanism of action for these variant isoforms or mutant receptors, experimental mutagenesis has been used to analyze the function of distinct amino acid residues in the ERs.This review will focus on ER␣ and ER␤ alterations in breast cancer.(Endocrine Reviews 25: 869 -898, 2004) I. Introduction II.ER Structure III.Roles of ER␣ and ER␤ IV.ERs in Human Breast Cancer V. Splicing and Genetic Alterations of ER␣ A. Alternative exons in the 5ЈUTR B. mRNA splice variants C. ER␣ experimental splice variants D. mRNA splice variants summary E. Natural mutations of ER␣ identified in human tissue samples F. Natural mutations conclusions G. Experimental mutations H. ER␣ experimental mutations summary VI.Splicing and Genetic Alterations of ER␤ A. Alternative exons in the 5ЈUTR B. Natural mRNA splice variants C. mRNA splice variants summary D. Natural point mutations identified in human tissue samples E. Experimental point mutations F. ER␤ summary VII.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/er.2003-0010

Cites

313 of 313 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 313 references

Cited by

See all 400

Metadata

Authors
Herynk, M. H., & Fuqua, S. A. W.
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
2004-12-01
Volume
25
Issue
6
Pages
869-898
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W2065346432
Cited by
400
References
313
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estrogen Receptor Mutations in Human Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/er.2003-0010
The paper
Herynk, M. H., & Fuqua, S. A. W. (2004). Estrogen Receptor Mutations in Human Disease. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/er.2003-0010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.