Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Diagnostic Errors after Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling

Swearingen, Brooke, Katznelson, Laurence, Miller, Karen, Grinspoon, Steven, Waltman, Arthur, Dorer, David J., Klibanski, Anne, Biller, Beverly M. K.·2004·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Although inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) is useful in the evaluation of Cushing's syndrome, false negative cases have been described, and many patients presumed to have ectopic tumors based upon negative IPSS remain without a final diagnosis. These patients are often managed as if they have as yet undiscovered ectopic tumors. To test this assumption, we conducted a retrospective review of our results to determine the ultimate diagnoses after IPSS. Between 1986 and 2002, 179 patients underwent 185 IPSS procedures as part of their evaluation for Cushing's syndrome. Confirmed diagnoses were available for 149 patients (83%): 139 patients had pituitary adenomas (94%), eight had bronchial carcinoids (5%), and two had adrenal tumors (1%). Threshold criteria for a pituitary source were defined as an inferior petrosal sinus to peripheral (IPS:P) basal ratio of 2:1 or greater without CRH or an IPS:P ratio of 3:1 or greater after CRH stimulation. There were nine patients in whom the IPS:P ratio failed to meet threshold criteria after successful sampling, but were nonetheless found to have pituitary tumors after transsphenoidal exploration (false negatives). Eight of these had received CRH and had a significant rise (>35%) in peripheral ACTH levels after CRH treatment, even though the IPS:P ratio did not reach the threshold. There were two patients in whom the IPS:P ratio reached threshold criteria, and ectopic tumors were demonstrated as the source of ACTH overproduction (false positives). The sensitivity after CRH stimulation was 90% (95% confidence interval, 80.8-95.5%) with a specificity of 67% (95% confidence interval, 11.4-94.5%). The positive and negative predictive values were 99 and 20%, respectively. Our data show that patients with an IPS:P ratio suggestive of a nonpituitary source of ACTH overproduction may still have Cushing's disease. Analyzing the CRH-stimulated peripheral ACTH levels in addition to the standard IPS:P ratios may provide improved diagnostic accuracy. Transsphenoidal exploration should be considered in all cases of unsuccessful sampling and in those cases for which no ectopic source can be identified after further body imaging, even if the IPSS is negative, and especially if peripheral ACTH levels rise significantly with CRH stimulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2003-032249

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Swearingen, B., Katznelson, L., Miller, K., Grinspoon, S., Waltman, A., Dorer, D. J., Klibanski, A., & Biller, B. M. K.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2004-08
Volume
89
Issue
8
Pages
3752-3763
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2010007827
Cited by
200
References
0
FWCI
7.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnostic Errors after Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2003-032249
The paper
Swearingen, B., Katznelson, L., Miller, K., Grinspoon, S., Waltman, A., Dorer, D. J., Klibanski, A., & Biller, B. M. K. (2004). Diagnostic Errors after Inferior Petrosal Sinus Sampling. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2003-032249

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.