Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 993

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BRAF Mutation Predicts a Poorer Clinical Prognosis for Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Xing, Mingzhao, Westra, William H., Tufano, Ralph P., Cohen, Yoram, Rosenbaum, Eli, Rhoden, Kerry J., Carson, Kathryn A., Vasko, Vasily, Larin, Alexandr, Tallini, Giovanni, Tolaney, Sara, Holt, Elizabeth H., Hui, Pei, Umbricht, Christopher B., Basaria, Shehzad, Ewertz, Marge, Tufaro, Anthony P., Califano, Joseph A., Ringel, Matthew D., Zeiger, Martha A., Sidransky, David, Ladenson, Paul W.·2005·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: Use of BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) has the potential to improve risk stratification of this cancer. Objective: The objective of the study was to investigate the prognostic value of BRAF mutation in patients with PTC. Design, Setting, and Subjects: In a multicenter study of 219 PTC patients, data on their clinicopathological characteristics and clinical courses between 1990 and 2004 were retrospectively collected, and their tumor BRAF mutation status was determined. Associations of BRAF mutation with initial tumor characteristics and subsequent recurrence were analyzed. Main Outcome Measure: Relationships between the BRAF mutation status and clinicopathological outcomes, including recurrence, were measured. Results: We found a significant association between BRAF mutation and extrathyroidal invasion (P < 0.001), lymph node metastasis (P < 0.001), and advanced tumor stage III/IV (P = 0.007) at initial surgery. This association remained significant on multivariate analysis, adjusting for conventional clinicopathological predictors of recurrence excluding the histological PTC subtype, but was lost when the tumor subtype was included in the model. BRAF mutation was also significantly associated with tumor recurrence, 25 vs. 9% with and without mutation, respectively (P = 0.004), during a median of 15 (interquartile range, 3–29) months of follow-up. This association remained significant on multivariate analysis adjusting for conventional clinicopathological predictors of recurrence, even including the PTC subtype (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1–14.1; P = 0.03). BRAF mutation was even an independent predictor of recurrence in patients with stage I/II disease, 22 vs. 5% with and without BRAF mutation, respectively (P = 0.002). BRAF mutation was also more frequently associated with absence of tumor I-131 avidity and treatment failure of recurrent disease. Conclusions: In patients with PTC, BRAF mutation is associated with poorer clinicopathological outcomes and independently predicts recurrence. Therefore, BRAF mutation may be a useful molecular marker to assist in risk stratification for patients with PTC.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2005-0987

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 993

Metadata

Authors
Xing, M., Westra, W. H., Tufano, R. P., Cohen, Y., Rosenbaum, E., Rhoden, K. J., Carson, K. A., Vasko, V., Larin, A., Tallini, G., Tolaney, S., Holt, E. H., Hui, P., Umbricht, C. B., Basaria, S., Ewertz, M., Tufaro, A. P., Califano, J. A., Ringel, M. D., Zeiger, M. A., Sidransky, D., & Ladenson, P. W.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2005-12-01
Volume
90
Issue
12
Pages
6373-6379
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2171379946
Cited by
993
References
3
FWCI
22.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRAF Mutation Predicts a Poorer Clinical Prognosis for Papillary Thyroid Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2005-0987
The paper
Xing, M., Westra, W. H., Tufano, R. P., Cohen, Y., Rosenbaum, E., Rhoden, K. J., Carson, K. A., Vasko, V., Larin, A., Tallini, G., Tolaney, S., Holt, E. H., Hui, P., Umbricht, C. B., Basaria, S., Ewertz, M., Tufaro, A. P., Califano, J. A., Ringel, M. D., . . . Ladenson, P. W. (2005). BRAF Mutation Predicts a Poorer Clinical Prognosis for Papillary Thyroid Cancer. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-0987

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.