Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 694

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prevalence and Distribution of Carcinoma in Patients with Solitary and Multiple Thyroid Nodules on Sonography

Open access
Frates, Mary C., Benson, Carol B., Doubilet, Peter M., Kunreuther, Elizabeth, Contreras, Maricela, Cibas, Edmund S., Orcutt, Joseph, Moore, Francis D., Larsen, P. Reed, Marqusee, Ellen, Alexander, Erik K.·2006·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Controversy remains as to the optimal management of patients with multiple thyroid nodules. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the prevalence, distribution, and sonographic features of thyroid cancer in patients with solitary and multiple thyroid nodules. DESIGN: We describe a retrospective observational cohort study that was carried out from 1995 to 2003. SETTING: The study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Patients with one or more thyroid nodules larger than 10 mm in diameter who had ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) were included in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were prevalence and distribution of thyroid cancer and the predictive value of demographic and sonographic features. RESULTS: A total of 1985 patients underwent FNA of 3483 nodules. The prevalence of thyroid cancer was similar between patients with a solitary nodule (175 of 1181 patients, 14.8%) and patients with multiple nodules (120 of 804, 14.9%) (P = 0.95, chi(2)). A solitary nodule had a higher likelihood of malignancy than a nonsolitary nodule (P < 0.01). In patients with multiple nodules larger than 10 mm, cancer was multifocal in 46%, and 72% of cancers occurred in the largest nodule. Multiple logistic regression analysis of statistically significant features demonstrates that the combination of patient gender (P < 0.02), whether a nodule is solitary vs. one of multiple (P < 0.002), nodule composition (P < 0.01), and presence of calcifications (P < 0.001) can be used to assign risk of cancer to each individual nodule. Risk ranges from a 48% likelihood of malignancy in a solitary solid nodule with punctate calcifications in a man to less than 3% in a noncalcified predominantly cystic nodule in a woman. CONCLUSIONS: In a patient with one or more thyroid nodules larger than 10 mm in diameter, the likelihood of thyroid cancer per patient is independent of the number of nodules, whereas the likelihood per nodule decreases as the number of nodules increases. For exclusion of cancer in a thyroid with multiple nodules larger than 10 mm, up to four nodules should be considered for FNA. Sonographic characteristics can be used to prioritize nodules for FNA based on their individual risk of cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2006-0690

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 694

Metadata

Authors
Frates, M. C., Benson, C. B., Doubilet, P. M., Kunreuther, E., Contreras, M., Cibas, E. S., Orcutt, J., Moore, F. D., Larsen, P. R., Marqusee, E., & Alexander, E. K.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2006-09-01
Volume
91
Issue
9
Pages
3411-3417
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2154264907
Cited by
694
References
0
FWCI
17.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence and Distribution of Carcinoma in Patients with Solitary and Multiple Thyroid Nodules on Sonography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2006-0690
The paper
Frates, M. C., Benson, C. B., Doubilet, P. M., Kunreuther, E., Contreras, M., Cibas, E. S., Orcutt, J., Moore, F. D., Larsen, P. R., Marqusee, E., & Alexander, E. K. (2006). Prevalence and Distribution of Carcinoma in Patients with Solitary and Multiple Thyroid Nodules on Sonography. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-0690

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.