The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Low Vitamin D Status despite Abundant Sun Exposure
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Lack of sun exposure is widely accepted as the primary cause of epidemic low vitamin D status worldwide. However, some individuals with seemingly adequate UV exposure have been reported to have low serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentration, results that might have been confounded by imprecision of the assays used. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to document the 25(OH)D status of healthy individuals with habitually high sun exposure. SETTING: This study was conducted in a convenience sample of adults in Honolulu, Hawaii (latitude 21 degrees ). PARTICIPANTS: The study population consisted of 93 adults (30 women and 63 men) with a mean (sem) age and body mass index of 24.0 yr (0.7) and 23.6 kg/m(2) (0.4), respectively. Their self-reported sun exposure was 28.9 (1.5) h/wk, yielding a calculated sun exposure index of 11.1 (0.7). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum 25(OH)D concentration was measured using a precise HPLC assay. Low vitamin D status was defined as a circulating 25(OH)D concentration less than 30 ng/ml. RESULTS: Mean serum 25(OH)D concentration was 31.6 ng/ml. Using a cutpoint of 30 ng/ml, 51% of this population had low vitamin D status. The highest 25(OH)D concentration was 62 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that variable responsiveness to UVB radiation is evident among individuals, causing some to have low vitamin D status despite abundant sun exposure. In addition, because the maximal 25(OH)D concentration produced by natural UV exposure appears to be approximately 60 ng/ml, it seems prudent to use this value as an upper limit when prescribing vitamin D supplementation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Toll-Like Receptor Triggering of a Vitamin D-Mediated Human Antimicrobial Response
Liu, P. T., Stenger, S., Li, H., Wenzel, L., Tan, B. H., Krutzik, S. R., Ochoa, M. T., Schauber, J., Wu, K., Meinken, C., et al. (2006) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1123933 · Cited by 3,924
Self-citationHolick, M. F., MacLaughlin, J. A., & Doppelt, S. H. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6256855 · Cited by 558
Cited by
Is vitamin D deficiency a major global public health problem?
Palacios, C., & Gonzalez, L. (2014) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2013.11.003 · Cited by 1,252
Inflammation and vitamin D: The infection connection
Mangin, M., Sinha, R., & Fincher, K. (2014) · Inflammation Research · doi:10.1007/s00011-014-0755-z · Cited by 274
Vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy – still a public health issue
McAree, T., Jacobs, B., Manickavasagar, T., Velagala, S., Brennan, L., Bassett, P., Rainbow, S., & Blair, M. (2013) · Maternal & Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.12014 · Cited by 79
Duration of casual sunlight exposure necessary for adequate vitamin D status in Indian men
Khadilkar, A., Patwardhan, V., Mughal, Z., Chiplonkar, S., Webb, A., Kift, R., Khadilkar, V., & Padidela, R. (2018) · Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.4103/ijem.ijem_473_17 · Cited by 45
Saha, S., Goswami, R., Ramakrishnan, L., Vishnubhatla, S., Mahtab, S., Kar, P., Srinivasan, S., Singh, N., & Singh, U. (2018) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/cen.13507 · Cited by 44
Mata-Granados, J. M., Cuenca-Acevedo, R., Luque de Castro, M. D., Sosa, M., & Quesada-Gómez, J. M. (2010) · Clinical Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2010.06.001 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Binkley, N., Novotny, R., Krueger, D., Kawahara, T., Daida, Y. G., Lensmeyer, G., Hollis, B. W., & Drezner, M. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2130-2135
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2161513493
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 23.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.