The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A Critical Analysis of Clinically Available Somatostatin Analog Formulations for Therapy of Acromegaly
Abstract
CONTEXT: Short and long-acting somatostatin (SRIF) analogs are approved for clinical use in acromegaly. Recent analysis of the relative efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR on the GH-IGF-I axis in acromegaly favored octreotide LAR in the secondary treatment of patients not preselected by SRIF responsiveness. A novel aqueous formulation of lanreotide, lanreotide Autogel (ATG), has recently been approved and is the predominant (and only in the United States) formulation of lanreotide used clinically. OBJECTIVE: We performed a critical review of SRIF analog treatment to establish the relative efficacy of three clinically available SRIF analog preparations, octreotide LAR, lanreotide SR, and lanreotide ATG (Somatuline depot in the United States) in control of the GH-IGF-I axis in acromegaly. DATA SOURCES: Data were drawn from MEDLINE and the bibliography of analyses of long-acting SRIF analogs. DATA COLLECTION: We reviewed the largest studies of sc octreotide, octreotide LAR, and lanreotide SR, all that included biochemical end-point data for lanreotide ATG, and studies that directly compared the efficacy of octreotide LAR and lanreotide SR. DATA SYNTHESIS: Caveats considered included differences in baseline GH and IGF-I values, patient selection, and interassay and intraassay variability, confounding the analysis. Studies comparing patients treated contiguously with lanreotide SR and octreotide LAR are fraught with methodological problems, however, are suggestive of marginally greater efficacy in control of the GH-IGF-I axis for octreotide LAR. Lanreotide ATG shows noninferiority to lanreotide SR. Five small studies directly comparing octreotide LAR and lanreotide ATG suggest no significant differences between these preparations in control of biochemical end-points. CONCLUSION: Lanreotide ATG and octreotide LAR are equivalent in the control of symptoms and biochemical markers in patients with acromegaly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Francis, G. L., Waguespack, S. G., Bauer, A. J., Angelos, P., Benvenga, S., Cerutti, J. M., Dinauer, C. A., Hamilton, J., Hay, I. D., Luster, M., et al. (2015) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2014.0460 · Cited by 1,238
Acromegaly pathogenesis and treatment
Melmed, S. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci39375 · Cited by 687
Self-citationA Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes
Melmed, S., Bronstein, M. D., Chanson, P., Klibanski, A., Casanueva, F. F., Wass, J. A. H., Strasburger, C. J., Luger, A., Clemmons, D. R., & Giustina, A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5 · Cited by 561
Self-citationPlace of Cabergoline in Acromegaly: A Meta-Analysis
Sandret, L., Maison, P., & Chanson, P. (2011) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2010-2443 · Cited by 314
(2011) · Endocrine Practice · doi:10.4158/ep.17.s4.1 · Cited by 259
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, R. D., & Melmed, S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 93
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2957-2968
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2161839947
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Analysis of Clinically Available Somatostatin Analog Formulations for Therapy of Acromegaly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2008-0027
- The paper
- Murray, R. D., & Melmed, S. (2008). A Critical Analysis of Clinically Available Somatostatin Analog Formulations for Therapy of Acromegaly. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.