Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 235

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: NICE-SUGAR or Leuven Blood Glucose Target?

Van den Berghe, Greet, Schetz, Miet, Vlasselaers, Dirk, Hermans, Greet, Wilmer, Alexander, Bouillon, Roger, Mesotten, Dieter·2009·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Hyper- and hypoglycemia are associated with increased mortality of critically ill patients, but whether this association is causal remains unclear. Early randomized-controlled studies compared insulin infusion targeting "age-normal" blood glucose levels, labeled intensive insulin therapy, with an approach that considered hyperglycemia as a beneficial adaptation. These studies found benefits with maintaining normoglycemia. A recent large multicenter study, NICE-SUGAR, compared a similar age-normal with an intermediate glucose target and found the intermediate target superior. These results require explanation. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: All published randomized controlled studies on glucose control in ICU were reviewed. The methodological differences between the repeat studies, most specifically NICE-SUGAR, and the original proof-of-concept studies, were systematically analyzed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: There were important methodological differences, possibly explaining different outcomes. These comprised different target ranges for blood glucose in control and intervention groups, different routes for insulin administration and types of infusion-pumps, different sampling sites, and different accuracies of glucometers, as well as different nutritional strategies and varying levels of expertise. CONCLUSIONS: These differences do not permit confident recommendations for a single optimal glucose target in variable ICU settings. Respecting the "primum non nocere" principle, it appears safe not to embark on targeting age-normal levels in ICUs that are not equipped to accurately and frequently measure blood glucose and have not acquired extensive experience with iv insulin administration using a customized guideline. A simple overall fall-back position could be to maintain blood glucose levels as close to normal as possible without evoking unacceptable fluctuations, hypoglycemia, and hypokalemia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2009-0663

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 10 references

Cited by

See all 235

Metadata

Authors
Van den Berghe, G., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Hermans, G., Wilmer, A., Bouillon, R., & Mesotten, D.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2009-09-01
Volume
94
Issue
9
Pages
3163-3170
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1971323045
Cited by
235
References
10
FWCI
23.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: NICE-SUGAR or Leuven Blood Glucose Target? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2009-0663
The paper
Van den Berghe, G., Schetz, M., Vlasselaers, D., Hermans, G., Wilmer, A., Bouillon, R., & Mesotten, D. (2009). Intensive Insulin Therapy in Critically Ill Patients: NICE-SUGAR or Leuven Blood Glucose Target? The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-0663

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.