The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Maternal Vitamin D Status Determines Bone Variables in the Newborn
Abstract
Context: Vitamin D regulates 3% of the human genome, including effects on bone health throughout life. Maternal vitamin D status may program neonatal skeletal development. The objective here was to determine the association of mothers’ vitamin D status with bone variables of their newborns. Subjects and Methods: In a birth hospital, pregnant women (n = 125) participated in a cross-sectional study with a longitudinal follow-up of the pregnancy. The mean (sd) values for age, body mass index before pregnancy, pregnancy weight gain, and total vitamin D intake in mothers were 31 (4) yr, 23.5 (3.7) kg/m2, 13.1 (4.3) kg, and 14.3 (5.8) μg, respectively. All newborns were full-term, 99% were appropriate for gestational age, and 53% were boys. Blood samples were collected from mothers during the first trimester and 2 d postpartum and from umbilical cords at birth for analysis of serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (S-25-OHD), PTH, and bone remodeling markers. Bone variables were measured by pQCT at the 20% site of the newborn tibia on an average of 10 (11) d postpartum. Bone contour was analyzed with a single threshold of 180 mg/mm3 for the detection of total bone mineral density (BMD), bone mineral content (BMC), and cross-sectional area (CSA). Results: Mean S-25-OHD was 41.0 (13.6), 45.1 (11.9), and 50.7 (14.9) nmol/liter during the first trimester, postpartum, and in the umbilical cord, respectively. The median value of the individual means for first trimester and the 2-d postpartum S-25-OHD was 42.6 nmol/liter, which was used as cutoff to define two equal-sized groups. Groups are called below median and above median in the text. Newborns below median were heavier (P = 0.05), and 60% were boys. Tibia bone mineral content was 0.047 (95% confidence interval, 0.011–0.082) g/cm higher (P = 0.01), and cross-sectional area was 12.3 (95% confidence interval, 2.0–22.6) mm2 larger (P = 0.02), but no difference in bone mineral density was observed, above median compared with below median group. These results were adjusted for newborn Z-score birth weight, maternal height, and newborn age at the measurement. A positive, significant correlation was observed between remodeling markers in mothers at different time points and above median group in the cord. Conclusions: Although the mean total intake of vitamin D among mothers met current Nordic recommendations, 71% of women and 15% of newborns were vitamin D deficient during the pregnancy. Our results suggest that maternal vitamin D status affects bone mineral accrual during the intrauterine period and influences bone size. More efforts should be made to revise current nutrition recommendations for pregnant women that may have permanent effects on the well-being of children.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy
Palacios, C., Kostiuk, L. K., & Peña-Rosas, J. P. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd008873.pub4 · Cited by 377
Global summary of maternal and newborn vitamin D status – a systematic review
Saraf, R., Morton, S. M. B., Camargo, C. A., & Grant, C. C. (2016) · Maternal & Child Nutrition · doi:10.1111/mcn.12210 · Cited by 365
Dawodu, A., & Tsang, R. C. (2012) · Advances in Nutrition · doi:10.3945/an.111.000950 · Cited by 144
(2013) · Europe PMC (PubMed Central) · Cited by 98
Influence of preeclampsia and gestational obesity in maternal and newborn levels of vitamin D
Pena, H. R., de Lima, M. C., Brandt, K. G., de Antunes, M. M. C., & da Silva, G. A. P. (2015) · BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth · doi:10.1186/s12884-015-0547-7 · Cited by 25
Composition and use of puppy milk replacers in German Shepherd puppies in the Netherlands
Corbee, R. J., Tryfonidou, M. A., Beckers, I. P., & Hazewinkel, H. A. W. (2012) · Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0396.2011.01153.x · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Viljakainen, H. T., Saarnio, E., Hytinantti, T., Miettinen, M., Surcel, H., Mäkitie, O., Andersson, S., Laitinen, K., & Lamberg-Allardt, C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2010-04-01
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1749-1757
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2091367032
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.