Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 74 of the 74 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Elamin, Mohamed B., Abu Elnour, Nisrin O., Elamin, Khalid B., Fatourechi, Mitra M., Alkatib, Aziz A., Almandoz, Jaime P., Liu, Hau, Lane, Melanie A., Mullan, Rebecca J., Hazem, Ahmad, Erwin, Patricia J., Hensrud, Donald D., Murad, Mohammad Hassan, Montori, Victor M.·2011·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Several studies found association between vitamin D levels and hypertension, coronary artery calcification, and heart disease. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to summarize the evidence on the effect of vitamin D on cardiovascular outcomes. DESIGN AND METHODS: We searched electronic databases from inception through August 2010 for randomized trials. Reviewers working in duplicate and independently extracted study characteristics, quality, and the outcomes of interest. Random-effects meta-analysis was used to pool the relative risks (RR) and the weighted mean differences across trials. RESULTS: We found 51 eligible trials with moderate quality. Vitamin D was associated with nonsignificant effects on the patient-important outcomes of death [RR, 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.93, 1.00; P = 0.08], myocardial infarction (RR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.93, 1.13; P = 0.64), and stroke (RR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.88, 1.25; P = 0.59). These analyses were associated with minimal heterogeneity. There were no significant changes in the surrogate outcomes of lipid fractions, glucose, or diastolic or systolic blood pressure. The latter analyses were associated with significant heterogeneity, and the pooled estimates were trivial in absolute terms. CONCLUSIONS: Trial data available to date are unable to demonstrate a statistically significant reduction in mortality and cardiovascular risk associated with vitamin D. The quality of the available evidence is low to moderate at best.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2011-0398

Cites

74 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 74 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Elamin, M. B., Abu Elnour, N. O., Elamin, K. B., Fatourechi, M. M., Alkatib, A. A., Almandoz, J. P., Liu, H., Lane, M. A., Mullan, R. J., Hazem, A., Erwin, P. J., Hensrud, D. D., Murad, M. H., & Montori, V. M.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2011-07-01
Volume
96
Issue
7
Pages
1931-1942
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2050399382
Cited by
414
References
74
FWCI
6.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2011-0398
The paper
Elamin, M. B., Abu Elnour, N. O., Elamin, K. B., Fatourechi, M. M., Alkatib, A. A., Almandoz, J. P., Liu, H., Lane, M. A., Mullan, R. J., Hazem, A., Erwin, P. J., Hensrud, D. D., Murad, M. H., & Montori, V. M. (2011). Vitamin D and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0398

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.