Cited by 467Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative StressNutrition and Health StudiesNutritional Studies and Diet

Efficacy of vitamin and antioxidant supplements in prevention of cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Open access
Myung, S.-K., Ju, W., Cho, B., Oh, S.-W., Park, S. M., Koo, B.-K., Park, B.-J., for the Korean Meta-Analysis (KORMA) Study Group·2013·BMJ

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of vitamin and antioxidant supplements in the prevention of cardiovascular diseases. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION: PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, CINAHL, and ClinicalTrials.gov searched in June and November 2012. Two authors independently reviewed and selected eligible randomised controlled trials, based on predetermined selection criteria. RESULTS: Out of 2240 articles retrieved from databases and relevant bibliographies, 50 randomised controlled trials with 294,478 participants (156,663 in intervention groups and 137,815 in control groups) were included in the final analyses. In a fixed effect meta-analysis of the 50 trials, supplementation with vitamins and antioxidants was not associated with reductions in the risk of major cardiovascular events (relative risk 1.00, 95% confidence interval 0.98 to 1.02; I(2)=42%). Overall, there was no beneficial effect of these supplements in the subgroup meta-analyses by type of prevention, type of vitamins and antioxidants, type of cardiovascular outcomes, study design, methodological quality, duration of treatment, funding source, provider of supplements, type of control, number of participants in each trial, and supplements given singly or in combination with other supplements. Among the subgroup meta-analyses by type of cardiovascular outcomes, vitamin and antioxidant supplementation was associated with a marginally increased risk of angina pectoris, while low dose vitamin B(6) supplementation was associated with a slightly decreased risk of major cardiovascular events. Those beneficial or harmful effects disappeared in subgroup meta-analysis of high quality randomised controlled trials within each category. Also, even though supplementation with vitamin B(6) was associated with a decreased risk of cardiovascular death in high quality trials, and vitamin E supplementation with a decreased risk of myocardial infarction, those beneficial effects were seen only in randomised controlled trials in which the supplements were supplied by the pharmaceutical industry. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence to support the use of vitamin and antioxidant supplements for prevention of cardiovascular diseases.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bmj.f10

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The impact of vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular mortality or prostate cancer is still not settled and clinical intervention studies have shown no benefit.

    “Nonetheless, the impact of vitamin E supplementation on cardiovascular mortality or prostate cancer is still not settled and clinical intervention studies have shown no bene fi t.”

    From EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). (2024) · cites this paper as [370]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) reports a prior meta-analysis finding no cardiovascular-death benefit from vitamin E, and the Results (page unavailable) find no overall cardiovascular benefit from vitamin or antioxidant supplements. The paper does not address whether vitamin E’s effect on prostate cancer is unsettled or whether intervention studies show no prostate-cancer benefit (searched: prostate cancer, prostate). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Myung, S.-K., Ju, W., Cho, B., Oh, S.-W., Park, S. M., Koo, B.-K., Park, B.-J., & for the Korean Meta-Analysis (KORMA) Study Group
Affiliations
  • Seoul National University (KR)
  • Ewha Womans University (KR)
Corresponding author
Cho, B.
Venue
BMJ
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2013-01-18
Volume
346
Issue
jan18 1
Pages
f10-f10
ISSN
1756-1833 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095592188
Cited by
467
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 39 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 42 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 30
FWCI
5.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • BMJ (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Seoul National University Open Repository (Seoul National University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutrition and Health Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
vitamin supplements, antioxidant supplements, cardiovascular disease prevention, vitamin B6, vitamin E, major cardiovascular events, angina pectoris, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, pharmaceutical industry funding, supplement quality
MeSH terms
Antioxidants, Cardiovascular Diseases, Humans, Vitamins, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Dietary Supplements

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review