The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Acromegaly: Remission Using Modern Criteria, Complications, and Predictors of Outcome
Abstract
CONTEXT: Despite the growing application of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS), outcomes for GH adenomas are not clearly defined. OBJECTIVE: We reviewed our experience with ETSS with specific interest in remission rates using the 2010 consensus criteria, predictors of remission, and associated complications. DESIGN AND SETTING: This was a retrospective single institution study. PATIENTS, INTERVENTIONS, AND OUTCOME MEASURES: Sixty acromegalic patients who underwent ETSS were identified. Remission was defined as a normal IGF-I and either a suppressed GH less than 0.4 ng/ml during an oral glucose tolerance test or a random GH less than 1.0 ng/ml. RESULTS: Remission was achieved in all 14 microadenomas and 28 of 46 macroadenomas (61%). Tumor size, age, gender, and history of prior surgery were not predictive on multivariant analysis. In hospital postoperative morning GH levels less than 2.5 ng/ml provided the best prediction of remission (P < 0.001). Preoperative variables predictive of remission included Knosp score (P = 0.017), IGF-I (P = 0.030), and GH (P = 0.042) levels. New endocrinopathy consisted of diabetes insipidus in 5%, adrenal insufficiency in 5.4%, and new hypogonadism in 29% of men and 17% of women. However, 41% of hypogonadal men had normal postoperative testosterone levels and 83% of amenorrheic women regained menses. The most common complaints after surgery were sinonasal (36 of 60, 60%) resolving in all but two. CONCLUSIONS: ETSS for GH adenomas is associated with high rates of remission and a low incidence of new endocrinopathy. Despite the panoramic views offered by the endoscope, invasive tumors continue to have lower rates of remission.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A Consensus Statement on acromegaly therapeutic outcomes
Melmed, S., Bronstein, M. D., Chanson, P., Klibanski, A., Casanueva, F. F., Wass, J. A. H., Strasburger, C. J., Luger, A., Clemmons, D. R., & Giustina, A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/s41574-018-0058-5 · Cited by 561
Systemic Complications of Acromegaly and the Impact of the Current Treatment Landscape: An Update
Gadelha, M. R., Kasuki, L., Lim, D. S. T., & Fleseriu, M. (2019) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2018-00115 · Cited by 363
A Pituitary Society update to acromegaly management guidelines
Fleseriu, M., Biller, B. M. K., Freda, P. U., Gadelha, M. R., Giustina, A., Katznelson, L., Molitch, M. E., Samson, S. L., Strasburger, C. J., van der Lely, A. J., et al. (2021) · Pituitary · doi:10.1007/s11102-020-01091-7 · Cited by 323
Yedinak, C., Hameed, N., Gassner, M., Brzana, J., McCartney, S., & Fleseriu, M. (2015) · Pituitary · doi:10.1007/s11102-015-0643-8 · Cited by 27
Metadata
- Authors
- Jane, J. A., Starke, R. M., Elzoghby, M. A., Reames, D. L., Payne, S. C., Thorner, M. O., Marshall, J. C., Laws, E. R., & Vance, M. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2011-09
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2732-2740
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2084999017
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 15.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Acromegaly: Remission Using Modern Criteria, Complications, and Predictors of Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2011-0554
- The paper
- Jane, J. A., Starke, R. M., Elzoghby, M. A., Reames, D. L., Payne, S. C., Thorner, M. O., Marshall, J. C., Laws, E. R., & Vance, M. L. (2011). Endoscopic Transsphenoidal Surgery for Acromegaly: Remission Using Modern Criteria, Complications, and Predictors of Outcome. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-0554
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.