Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Association Between Lean Mass, Fat Mass, and Bone Mineral Density: A Meta-analysis

Ho-Pham, Lan T., Nguyen, Uyen D. T., Nguyen, Tuan V.·2014·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Body weight is the most important anthropometric determinant of bone mineral density (BMD). Body weight is mainly made up of lean mass (LM) and fat mass (FM), and which component is more important to BMD has been a controversial issue. OBJECTIVE: This study sought to compare the magnitude of association between LM, FM, and BMD by using a meta-analytic approach. DATA SOURCE: Using an electronic and manual search, we identified 44 studies that had examined the correlation between LM, FM, and BMD between 1989 and 2013. These studies involved 20,226 men and women (4966 men and 15,260 women) aged between 18 and 92 years. We extracted the correlations between LM, FM, and BMD at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and whole body. The synthesis of correlation coefficients was done by the random-effects meta-analysis model. RESULTS: The overall correlation between LM and femoral neck BMD (FNBMD) was 0.39 (95% confidence interval, 0.34 to 0.43), which was significantly higher than the correlation between FM and FNBMD (0.28; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.33). The effect of LM on FNBMD in men (r=0.43) was greater than that in women (r=0.38). In premenopausal women, the effect of LM on BMD was greater than the effect of FM (r=0.45 vs r=0.30); however, in postmenopausal women, the effects of LM and FM on BMD were comparable (r=0.33 vs r=0.31). CONCLUSION: LM exerts a greater effect on BMD than FM in men and women combined. This finding underlines the concept that physical activity is an important component in the prevention of bone loss and osteoporosis in the population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2013-3190

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Ho-Pham, L. T., Nguyen, U. D. T., & Nguyen, T. V.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2014-01
Volume
99
Issue
1
Pages
30-38
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1982096454
Cited by
286
References
5
FWCI
25.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Association Between Lean Mass, Fat Mass, and Bone Mineral Density: A Meta-analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2013-3190
The paper
Ho-Pham, L. T., Nguyen, U. D. T., & Nguyen, T. V. (2014). Association Between Lean Mass, Fat Mass, and Bone Mineral Density: A Meta-analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-3190

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.