Cited by 102Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsBone health and osteoporosis researchHormonal and reproductive studies

Effects of Recombinant Human Growth Hormone Therapy on Bone Mineral Density in Adults With Growth Hormone Deficiency: A Meta-Analysis

Barake, Maya, Klibanski, Anne, Tritos, Nicholas A.·2014·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Objective GH deficiency is associated with decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and increased fracture risk. Because the effects of recombinant human GH (rhGH) therapy on BMD and bone mineral content have not been systematically investigated, we conducted a meta-analysis of pertinent studies. Design A thorough search of the literature (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Register) was performed. Relevant studies were divided and analyzed according to their design (randomized/controlled or prospective/retrospective) and duration of rhGH therapy (≤12 months and > 12 months). Results Administration of rhGH led to a significant increase in lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD in randomized/controlled studies of more than 1 year [weighted mean difference (95% confidence interval)] of 0.038 g/cm(2) (0.011-0.065) and 0.021 g/cm(2) (0.006-0.037) at the LS and FN, respectively, and a nonsignificant drop at the same sites in studies of shorter duration. In prospective studies, a significant increase in the LS and FN BMD was obtained. On meta-regression, a negative association was observed between the change in LS and FN BMD and subjects' age and a positive association between the BMD change and treatment duration. In a subgroup analysis, the increase in LS and FN BMD was significant in men [0.048 g/cm(2) (0.033-0.064) and 0.051 g/cm(2) (0.003-0.098), respectively] but not in women. Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests a beneficial effect of rhGH replacement on BMD in adults with…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2013-3921

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Similar outcomes (significant increase in BMD) were observed in prospective studies of rhGH administration.

    “Similar outcomes were observed in prospective studies.”

    From Pituitary Disorders and Osteoporosis (2015) · cites this paper as [57]

  • During rhGH treatment, BMD decreases within the first months and then increases after at least one year of therapy.

    “BMD within the first months of treatment decreased which was followed by a subsequent increase after at least one year of therapy.”

    From Pituitary Disorders and Osteoporosis (2015) · cites this paper as [57]

  • GH replacement promotes bone turnover by stimulating both bone formation and bone resorption, which is prominent during the first phase of GH treatment.

    “GH replacement promotes bone turnover by stimulating both bone formation and bone resorption, which is prominent during the first phase of GH treatment.”

    From Pituitary Disorders and Osteoporosis (2015) · cites this paper as [57]

  • The doses of rhGH used in studies varied from 0.2 to 0.96 mg/daily, with higher doses prescribed to women and patients with CO GHD.

    “The doses used in studies varied from 0.2 to 0.96 mg/daily with higher doses prescribed to women and patients with CO GHD [57].”

    From Pituitary Disorders and Osteoporosis (2015) · cites this paper as [57]

  • Administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) resulted in a significant increase in BMD in randomized/controlled studies of more than 12 months.

    “Recent meta-analysis revealed that administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) resulted in a significant increase in BMD in randomized/controlled studies of more than 12 months.”

    From Pituitary Disorders and Osteoporosis (2015) · cites this paper as [57]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Barake, M., Klibanski, A., & Tritos, N. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Tritos, Nicholas A.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2014-03-01
Volume
99
Issue
3
Pages
852-860
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2052576311
Cited by
102
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Bone health and osteoporosis research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
Keywords
recombinant human growth hormone, growth hormone deficiency, bone mineral density, bone mineral content, lumbar spine, femoral neck, treatment duration, sex differences, age effects, fracture risk, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Hypopituitarism, Male, Middle Aged, Recombinant Proteins, Bone Density, Human Growth Hormone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review