Cited by 32LGBTQ Health, Identity, and PolicyHormonal and reproductive studiesSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Medroxyprogesterone acetate in Gender-Affirming therapy for Transwomen: results from a retrospective study

Jain, Jaison, Kwan, Daniel, Forcier, Michelle·2019·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is a widely used progestin in feminizing hormone therapy. However, the side effects and hormonal changes elicited by this drug have never been investigated in the transgender population. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the incidence of self-reported effects among transwomen using MPA and this drug's impact on hormonal and metabolic parameters. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We retrospectively collected data from 290 follow-up visits (FUVs) of transwomen treated at Rhode Island Hospital from January 2011 to July 2018 (mean duration of therapy 3.4 ± 1.7 years). FUVs followed regimens of estradiol (E) and spironolactone, with MPA (n = 102) or without MPA (n = 188). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We assessed the incidence of self-reported effects after MPA treatment. We also compared blood levels of E, testosterone, and various laboratory parameters between MPA and non-MPA groups. RESULTS: Mean weighted E level was 211 ± 57 pg/mL after MPA treatment and 210 ± 31 pg/mL otherwise; this difference was nonsignificant [t(274) = 0.143, P = 0.886]. Mean weighted testosterone level was 79 ± 18 ng/dL after MPA treatment and 215 ± 29 ng/dL otherwise; testosterone levels were significantly lower in the MPA group [t(122) = 32.4, P < 0.001]. There were minimal changes in other laboratory parameters. Of 39 patients receiving MPA, 26 reported improved breast development and 11 reported decreased facial hair. Five patients experienced mood swings on MPA. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort of transwomen, we found minimal side effects, unchanged E levels, and a decline in testosterone associated with MPA, outcomes consistent with feminization. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2018-02253

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jain, J., Kwan, D., & Forcier, M.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Corresponding author
Jain, Jaison
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2019-04-25
Volume
104
Issue
11
Pages
5148-5156
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2942433353
Cited by
32
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4
FWCI
5.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
medroxyprogesterone acetate, gender-affirming hormone therapy, transgender women, feminizing hormone therapy, estradiol, spironolactone, testosterone levels, breast development, mood changes, adverse drug reactions, progestins
MeSH terms
Adult, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Breast, Estradiol, Estrogens, Female, Hair, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Spironolactone, Testosterone, Incidence, Treatment Outcome, Medroxyprogesterone Acetate, Self Report, Transgender Persons, Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review