Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 506

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Additive insulinotropic effects of exogenous synthetic human gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36) amide infused at near-physiological insulinotropic hormone and glucose concentrations

Nauck, M. A.·1993·Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36) amide (GLP-1) are glucose-dependent insulinotropic gut hormones that may explain the greater insulin secretory response with oral compared to i.v. glucose (incretin effect). To study their individual and combined contributions, in eight healthy volunteers, on separate occasions, synthetic human GIP (1 pmol/kg.min) and/or GLP-1 (0.3 pmol/kg.min) or placebo were infused i.v. (-30 to 120 min), while at 0 min, a glucose infusion "isoglycemic" to the profile after an oral glucose load of 50 g/400 mL was started. After the administration of 50 g oral glucose, immunoreactive GIP rose several-fold to 337 +/- 43 pmol/L, while there was only a transient (10-30 min) and moderate increment in immunoreactive GLP-1 (from basal, 25-30, to 41 +/- 4 pmol/L). Isoglycemic i.v. glucose infusions led to smaller B-cell responses (estimated incretin effect, 41 +/- 5%). With single infusions of GIP or GLP-1 (circulating concentrations, 464 +/- 73 and 54 +/- 3 pmol/L, respectively), B-cell responses were significantly augmented compared to i.v. glucose alone and were no longer significantly different from those after oral glucose. The combination of GIP and GLP-1 led to B-cell responses that were significantly higher than those with either hormone alone (additive mode of cooperation). Plasma GIP concentrations were similar after endogenous secretion (oral glucose) and i.v. infusion, while exogenously administered GLP-1 led to plasma levels that were maintained at an elevated level for a longer period during exogenous infusion than after stimulation by oral glucose. When, in seven volunteers, a lower dose (0.15 pmol/kg.min) of GLP-1 was infused during isoglycemic glucose infusion experiments only for the duration of elevated plasma levels in the oral glucose challenges (0-30 min), a significant, but transient, increment in insulin and C-peptide concentrations was observed, which was equivalent to 26 +/- 10% of the estimated incretin effect. Therefore, in conclusion, circulating GIP seems to make a major contribution to the incretin effect after oral glucose, and GLP-1 appears to mediate a smaller proportion. GIP and GLP-1 can interact in an additive manner in normal man.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.76.4.912

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 506

Metadata

Authors
Nauck, M. A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1993-04-01
Volume
76
Issue
4
Pages
912-917
ISSN
0021-972X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2080959651
Cited by
506
References
5
FWCI
7.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive insulinotropic effects of exogenous synthetic human gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36) amide infused at near-physiological insulinotropic hormone and glucose concentrations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.76.4.912
The paper
Nauck, M. A. (1993). Additive insulinotropic effects of exogenous synthetic human gastric inhibitory polypeptide and glucagon-like peptide-1-(7-36) amide infused at near-physiological insulinotropic hormone and glucose concentrations. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.76.4.912

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.