The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Prospective Study of the Prevalence of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Unselected Caucasian Women from Spain
Abstract
We prospectively estimated the prevalence of the polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), as defined by the NIH/NICHHD 1990 endocrine criteria, in a population of 154 Caucasian women of reproductive age reporting spontaneously for blood donation.Anthropometric data; the presence of hirsutism, acne, and androgenic alopecia; and the menstrual history were recorded by a single investigator.In 145 women, blood samples were also obtained for measurement of serum androgen levels.PCOS was defined by the presence of 1) oligomenorrhea, 2) clinical and/or biochemical hyperandrogenism, and 3) exclusion of hyperprolactinemia, thyroid disorders, and nonclassic 21-hydroxylase deficiency.Hirsutism was defined by a modified Ferriman-Gallwey score of 8 or more, acne was considered as a sign of hyperan-drogenism when persistent after the second decade of life, and hyperandrogenemia was defined by an increase in circulating testosterone or dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate or an increase in the free androgen index above the 95th percentile of the control values derived from the nonhirsute, nonacneic women having regular menses who were not receiving hormonal therapy.PCOS was present in 10 (6.5%), hirsutism was present in 11 (7.1%), and acne was present in 19 (12.3%) of the 154 women.Our results demonstrate a 6.5% prevalence of PCOS, as defined, in a minimally biased population of Caucasian women from Spain.The polycystic ovary syndrome, hirsutism, and acne are common endocrine disorders in women.(
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ovarian and adrenal contribution to peripheral androgens during the menstrual cycle
ABRAHAM, G. E. (1974) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-39-2-340 · Cited by 436
Azziz, R., Hincapie, L. A., Knochenhauer, E. S., Dewailly, D., Fox, L., & Boots, L. R. (1999) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(99)00383-0 · Cited by 244
Cited by
Ehrmann, D. A. (2005) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra041536 · Cited by 1,881
March, W. A., Moore, V. M., Willson, K. J., Phillips, D. I. W., Norman, R. J., & Davies, M. J. (2010) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dep399 · Cited by 1,799
Teede, H., Deeks, A., & Moran, L. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-41 · Cited by 1,565
Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of polycystic ovary syndrome
Sirmans, S., & Pate, K. (2013) · Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.2147/clep.s37559 · Cited by 1,302
Yildiz, B. O., Bozdag, G., Yapici, Z., Esinler, I., & Yarali, H. (2012) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/des232 · Cited by 704
Metadata
- Authors
- Asuncion, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2000-07-01
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2434-2438
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4249219434
- Cited by
- 791
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Prospective Study of the Prevalence of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Unselected Caucasian Women from Spain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.85.7.2434
- The paper
- Asuncion, M. (2000). A Prospective Study of the Prevalence of the Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Unselected Caucasian Women from Spain. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.85.7.2434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.