The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Follicular Depletion During the Menopausal Transition: Evidence for Accelerated Loss and Ultimate Exhaustion*
Abstract
Although the menopause is generally considered to be the consequence of follicular exhaustion, the relationship between follicle number and the menopausal transition has not been explicity studied. We addressed this question in 17 women, aged 45-55 yr, who were undergoing elective total abdominal hysterectomy and salpingo-oophorectomy. The women were divided into 3 groups according to their menstrual history: 1) menstruating regularly (n = 6), 2) perimenopausal (irregular menses; n = 7), and 3) postmenopausal (greater than 1 yr since last menses; n = 4). The mean ages of the 3 groups were similar. Menstrual histories were confirmed by plasma hormone levels and endometrial histology. One ovary from each woman was serially sectioned for determination of follicle numbers. The mean number of primordial follicles in the ovaries of women who were still menstruating regularly was 10-fold higher than that in perimenopausal women [1392 +/- 355 (+/- SEM) vs. 142 +/- 72]. Follicles were virtually absent in the postmenopausal ovaries. Comparison of these data with those obtained by others in younger women suggests that follicular depletion accelerates dramatically in the last decade of menstrual life. These results support the view that declining follicular reserve is the immediate cause of both the perimenopausal and menopausal transitions, and indicate that the rate and, therefore, the regulation of follicular depletion change during the final phase of reproductive life.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Initial and cyclic recruitment of ovarian follicles
McGee, E. A., & Hsueh, A. J. W. (2000) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/edrv.21.2.0394 · Cited by 1,771
Ovarian aging: mechanisms and clinical consequences
Broekmans, F. J., Soules, M. R., & Fauser, B. C. (2009) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0006 · Cited by 1,248
The variability of female reproductive ageing
te Velde, E. R. (2002) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/8.2.141 · Cited by 1,214
Grandmothers and the evolution of human longevity
Hawkes, K. (2003) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.10156 · Cited by 582
Hansen, K. R., Knowlton, N. S., Thyer, A. C., Charleston, J. S., Soules, M. R., & Klein, N. A. (2008) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/dem408 · Cited by 561
Metadata
- Authors
- RICHARDSON, S. J., SENIKAS, V., & NELSON, J. F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1987-12
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1231-1237
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2030781538
- Cited by
- 710
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Follicular Depletion During the Menopausal Transition: Evidence for Accelerated Loss and Ultimate Exhaustion*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-65-6-1231
- The paper
- RICHARDSON, S. J., SENIKAS, V., & NELSON, J. F. (1987). Follicular Depletion During the Menopausal Transition: Evidence for Accelerated Loss and Ultimate Exhaustion*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-65-6-1231
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.