The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minimal Model Analysis of Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test-Derived Insulin Sensitivity in Diabetic Subjects*
Abstract
Although minimal model analysis of frequently sampled iv glucose tolerance tests (FSIGTs) to measure insulin sensitivity is well recognized, application has been limited by the need for endogenous insulin secretion. In the present study we determined whether use of exogenous insulin could permit minimal model assessment of insulin sensitivity (SI) to be extended to diabetic subjects. Normal volunteers had separate FSIGT assessments supplemented with both tolbutamide and insulin to accelerate glucose disappearance, while diabetics had a FSIGT supplemented only with insulin. There was a strong and highly significant correlation between the two assessments in normal subjects (r = 0.87; P less than 0.001), and the rank order of SI generally was maintained with the two assessments over a 3-fold range of SI; however, insulin-determined SI was 16% lower (3.4 +/- 0.4 vs. 4.1 +/- 0.4 x 10(-4) min/microU.microL; P less than 0.01). Diabetic subjects had markedly lower insulin sensitivity than controls (SI = 0.61 +/- 0.16; P less than 0.0001). Across all subjects, the level of fasting serum glucose was correlated inversely with both insulin sensitivity (r = -0.62; P less than 0.05) and acute insulin responses (r = -0.72; P less than 0.02); however, insulin sensitivity in diabetic subjects with little insulin secretion (0.6 +/- 0.2) was comparable to insulin sensitivity in diabetic subjects with near-normal responses (0.6 +/- 0.3). In subjects with fasting hyperglycemia, there were significant correlations between insulin sensitivity and body mass index, percent fat mass, and waist/hip ratio (all P less than 0.03). Among all female subjects, there was also a strong correlation between insulin sensitivity and upper body obesity, as measured by waist/hip ratio (r = -0.68; P less than 0.02). Model parameters also permitted glucose uptake to be estimated in diabetic vs. normal subjects at comparable hyperglycemia (11.1 mmol/L). Total glucose uptake was decreased in diabetic subjects (5.2 +/- 0.8 vs. 12.7 +/- 1.7 mg/min.kg in normals; P less than 0.001), insulin-dependent glucose uptake was diminished to a greater extent (1.3 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.2 +/- 1.2) than noninsulin-independent glucose uptake (3.9 +/- 0.5 vs. 6.4 +/- 0.9; both P less than 0.02). Administration of insulin permits minimal model FSIGT analysis to be applied to diabetic as well as normal subjects, yielding information about both insulin- and noninsulin-mediated glucose uptake as well as insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Triumvirate: β-Cell, Muscle, Liver: A Collusion Responsible for NIDDM
DeFronzo, R. A. (1988) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.37.6.667 · Cited by 2,456
Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity.
Bergman, R. N., Ider, Y. Z., Bowden, C. R., & Cobelli, C. (1979) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.1979.236.6.e667 · Cited by 1,874
Self-citationBergman, R. N., Phillips, L. S., & Cobelli, C. (1981) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci110398 · Cited by 1,640
Self-citationBergman, R. N., Prager, R., Volund, A., & Olefsky, J. M. (1987) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci112886 · Cited by 772
Self-citationInsulin Control of Glucose Metabolism in Man
Insel, P. A., Liljenquist, J. E., Tobin, J. D., Sherwin, R. S., Watkins, P., Andres, R., & Berman, M. (1975) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci108006 · Cited by 244
In Vivo Regulation of Non-Insulin-Mediated and Insulin-Mediated Glucose Uptake by Cortisol
Baron, A. D., Wallace, P., & Brechtel, G. (1987) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.36.11.1230 · Cited by 56
A minimal-model-based glucose clamp yielding insulin sensitivity independent of glycemia
Pacini, G., Finegood, D. T., & Bergman, R. N. (1982) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diab.31.5.432 · Cited by 44
Self-citation
Cited by
Kahn, S. E. (2003) · Diabetologia · doi:10.1007/s00125-002-1009-0 · Cited by 2,166
Diamanti-Kandarakis, E., & Dunaif, A. (2012) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2011-1034 · Cited by 1,947
Kern, P. A., Ranganathan, S., Li, C., Wood, L., & Ranganathan, G. (2001) · American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism · doi:10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.5.e745 · Cited by 1,883
Adiponectin Expression From Human Adipose Tissue
Kern, P. A., Di Gregorio, G. B., Lu, T., Rassouli, N., & Ranganathan, G. (2003) · Diabetes · doi:10.2337/diabetes.52.7.1779 · Cited by 875
Ethnic Differences in the Relationship Between Insulin Sensitivity and Insulin Response
Kodama, K., Tojjar, D., Yamada, S., Toda, K., Patel, C. J., & Butte, A. J. (2013) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc12-1235 · Cited by 599
Metadata
- Authors
- WELCH, S., GEBHART, S. S. P., BERGMAN, R. N., & PHILLIPS, L. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1990-12
- Volume
- 71
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1508-1518
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2049025878
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 3.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimal Model Analysis of Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test-Derived Insulin Sensitivity in Diabetic Subjects*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-71-6-1508
- The paper
- WELCH, S., GEBHART, S. S. P., BERGMAN, R. N., & PHILLIPS, L. S. (1990). Minimal Model Analysis of Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test-Derived Insulin Sensitivity in Diabetic Subjects*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-71-6-1508
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.