Insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 concentrations compared to stimulated and night growth hormone in the evaluation of short children--a clinical research center study.

Abstract

To evaluate the relative usefulness of insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in screening for GH status, GH stimulation (arginine-insulin/L-DOPA) tests and overnight GH studies (every 20 min sampling) were performed in 104 healthy short children (32 girls), aged 3-16 yr (height, -1.8 or more SD). IGFBP-3 had no advantage over IGF-I in screening sensitivity or specificity. IGF-I correlated with mean nighttime GH. Both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 correlated with peak stimulated GH. To identify more than 90% of children with GH deficiency (GHD) and borderline GHD, the mean values for age for IGF-I and IGFBP-3 were required as the cut-off criterion. However, at this criterion, 70% or more of idiopathic short stature (ISS) children would have to undergo testing to identify 90% of GHD or borderline GHD. More stringent criteria (-1.0, -1.64, and -2.0 SD) were more specific, but lost sensitivity. A practical application is suggested. Screening use of IGF-I with criterion of -1.0 SD would identify a subgroup that includes 88% of GHD, 71% of borderline GHD, and 46% of ISS. Both IGF-I and IGF-BP-3 higher than -1.0 SD would accurately identify 68% of ISS as not needing GH testing. Evaluation of growth velocity would identify the remaining children requiring definitive testing. Thus, combined screening for GHD using both IGF-I and IGFBP-3 has no better sensitivity than either test alone. However, such combined screening will improve the specificity and thus decrea…